Search for: "People v. Thomas"
Results 4481 - 4500
of 5,319
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 Jan 2018, 10:25 am
The first was a March 2017 ruling in Leonard v. [read post]
23 Sep 2018, 4:07 pm
In a similar vein, Equifax has been fined £500,000 by the ICO (the press release can be found here and Equifax’s response here) for its failure to protect the personal data of over 15 million people in the UK following a breach in 2017. [read post]
4 Jun 2011, 6:23 pm
This week in Ashcroft v. [read post]
31 Mar 2011, 11:36 am
(Thomas Dunlap, the Copyright Group’s lead attorney, did not respond for comment.) [read post]
26 Mar 2012, 11:00 pm
In Marbury v. [read post]
25 Jun 2024, 1:29 pm
Post, at 6–7 (THOMAS, J., dissenting). [read post]
13 Aug 2019, 2:48 pm
Laird and Marbury v. [read post]
29 Jan 2017, 4:08 pm
A new report has said that an artificial intelligence watchdog should be set up to make sure people are not discriminated against by the automated computer systems making important decisions about their lives. [read post]
9 Apr 2009, 9:27 am
(Afro-IP) Australia Major changes to Patents Act proposed; proposed changes anger Australian patent attorneys (Mallesons Stephen Jaques) (Managing Intellectual Property) IP examination centre in Melbourne to boost Australian innovation and jobs (IP Down Under) Full Federal Court: ‘Use it or lose it’ approach confirmed: E & J Gallo Winery v Lion Nathan (Mallesons Stephen Jaques) Bulgaria M-Tel ‘best Bulgarian brand’ in… [read post]
28 Sep 2011, 2:38 pm
Thomas. [read post]
10 Jul 2023, 1:58 am
Leonid V. [read post]
20 Mar 2007, 8:25 pm
(Note: Bush v. [read post]
10 Jul 2023, 1:58 am
Leonid V. [read post]
31 Aug 2016, 7:53 am
The Ricci v. [read post]
16 Mar 2008, 10:41 am
The current Supreme Court has at least two members who seem strongly influenced by originalist constitutional theory--Associate Justices Antonin Scalia and Clarence Thomas and two others, John Roberts and Samuel Alito who may also be receptive to originalist arguments. [read post]
19 Jul 2009, 2:07 pm
For example, the intention behind the equal protection clause might be formulated at a relatively high level of generality--leading to the conclusion that segregation is unconstitutional--or at a very particular level--in which case the fact that the Reconstruction Congress segregated the District of Columbia schools might be thought to support the "separate but equal" principle of Plessy v. [read post]
18 Apr 2022, 8:45 pm
Nken v. [read post]
3 May 2023, 5:36 am
In 2015 in Michigan v. [read post]
16 Jun 2008, 4:00 am
Crist v. [read post]
19 Sep 2020, 6:30 am
These self-proclaimed democratsclamor to speak for the rising people, over and above the established elites and tired institutions. [read post]
