Search for: "Plaintiff(s)"
Results 4481 - 4500
of 178,381
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Dec 2012, 9:12 am
Addressing the “suitable seating” issue at Kmart’s Tulare, California store, the court rejected plaintiffs’ counsel’s arguments that Kmart was required to redesign its cashier and bagging areas in order to provide seats. [read post]
3 Oct 2014, 7:37 am
As in many coordinated proceedings, plaintiffs in this MDL were directed to use an approved Short Form Complaint with boxes to check for the product(s) at issue, the defendants, and the asserted claims. [read post]
27 Sep 2009, 7:25 pm
The only thing they had to consider what damages to award after the Madison County Judge struck the defendant's pleadings on the negligence issue and directed the verdict on the liability issues for the plaintiff. [read post]
27 Mar 2013, 3:06 am
Judge Dow granted plaintiff’s motion to stay its patent infringement case pending an inter partes review of the patent in suit initiated by defendants. [read post]
25 Apr 2009, 7:01 pm
The latest "swoon-and-fall" case against a church comes with a novel twist -- the plaintiff was allegedly injured when another member of an Oregon church who was "slain in the spirit" fell on her. [read post]
19 Feb 2012, 4:58 pm
The administrator was accused of making inappropriate comments about one of the plaintiff’s body and clothes, suggesting she undress to show how many tattoos she had and inappropriately brushing her body against the plaintiff in a filing room. [read post]
2 Jun 2009, 12:35 am
Defendants' motion for Rule 11 sanctions was denied where the court found that plaintiff's position on standing was "at least arguable. . . . [read post]
3 Jun 2014, 1:22 am
May 29, 2014), disagreed, observing that counsel’s arguments miss the point. [read post]
2 Feb 2009, 2:32 am
Ed. 845, 58 S. [read post]
8 Oct 2009, 3:32 pm
Accordingly, plaintiff’s motion for an adverse inference instruction was denied. [read post]
30 Mar 2009, 2:30 pm
The ruling, which plaintiffs’ lawyers cheered, created a contrast with last year’s Riegel decision. [read post]
20 Jul 2007, 6:23 am
Jul 03, 2007) (NO. 06 CIV 5863 JGK):Based on the present allegations, the plaintiff has, at the very least, pleaded a plausible claim that the plaintiff was an intended third-party beneficiary of the Management Agreement between the defendants and Campbell and thus entitled to assert a claim for breach of the Management Agreement. [read post]
29 Jun 2020, 11:19 am
” On this news, the Company’s share price fell $0.08, or 2.5%, to close at $3.12 per share on March 18, 2020. [read post]
14 Sep 2011, 7:00 am
A recent opinion from California's Court of Appeal, Fifth Appellate District, gives employment law plaintiffs a weapon in asserting admissibility of evidence of workplace harassment or hostile environment, even if the bad act occurred outside the plaintiff's presence or knowledge; and even if it occurred at a time when plaintiff was not even employed by this employer. [read post]
11 Aug 2016, 9:53 am
Most readers will know Ray Niro as the original patent plaintiff’s lawyer. [read post]
16 Jan 2023, 6:00 am
Facts: Plaintiff was a department manager of Defendant’s car dealership. [read post]
13 Aug 2009, 5:42 pm
So I'm going with Judge Gilbert's common sense, nuts and bolts answer to this question of whether MSA's re required in liability settlements involving Medicare-qualified plaintiffs: "Probably not, but sometimes you should do it anyhow. [read post]
23 Jan 2019, 10:01 pm
James denied the defendant’s Motion to Compel regarding the defendant’s request for the plaintiff to produce all of his cellphones for inspection and copying. [read post]
25 Sep 2014, 4:54 pm
It permits the court to mete out fair punishment for a young adult's crimes and transgressions yet mitigates future consequences in recognition of, inter alia, the youth's lack of experience and the court's hope for his future constructive life. [read post]
6 Oct 2011, 11:13 am
The Court’s opt-in order “instructed prospective plaintiffs to sign, date and forward the consent form to plaintiffs’ counsel within the opt-in period. [read post]
