Search for: "ROUNDS v. STATE"
Results 4481 - 4500
of 7,625
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Jun 2019, 6:18 am
Because “a rule may be mandatory without being jurisdictional, and Title VII’s charge-filing requirement fits that bill,” the Fifth Circuit’s reversal of summary judgment against the employee was affirmed (Fort Bend County, Texas v. [read post]
11 Apr 2022, 4:58 am
EU introduces a fifth package of measures New asset freezes On 8 April 2022, the EU published a fifth round of measures against Russia and Belarus. [read post]
7 Feb 2019, 2:30 pm
And a previous, separate effort from 19 states and the District of Columbia to keep the gun files offline, State of Washington v. [read post]
15 Mar 2018, 4:27 am
In other words, the question was whether the judgment of Gage LJ in Tetteh v Kingston Upon Thames Royal London Borough Council [2004] EWCA Civ 1775 survived Hotak; ie that it remained correct in asserting that a review decision had to be read as a whole and that there was no reason for the reviewer to go further than stating the test and the overall finding. [read post]
18 Jun 2010, 3:00 am
The Round Table, Inc., 624 S.W.2d 547, 550 (Tenn. 1981); City of Elizabethton at 117; Frady v. [read post]
27 Mar 2017, 1:22 pm
Those four states are the last to be added to the list, rounding out a complete list of 45 states where Amazon will now collect sales tax. [read post]
27 Nov 2017, 9:18 am
The new case was Norman v. [read post]
16 Apr 2009, 1:25 pm
The case, Golan v. [read post]
15 Jul 2010, 2:20 am
Supreme Court’s recent decision in the Morrison v. [read post]
23 Mar 2009, 5:40 am
Summary of Decision issued March 10, 2009Summaries are prepared by Law Librarians and are not official statements of the Wyoming Supreme CourtCase Name: Latta v. [read post]
25 Jul 2023, 6:56 pm
(That "standard" was set by the Supreme Court in Caeteno v. [read post]
28 Jul 2021, 8:49 am
This type of arrangement is commonly known as a “round-the-world” scheme. [read post]
11 Dec 2017, 10:04 pm
" [the court’s emphasis]The Honda court stated (paragraph 47), with reference to the above passage, that it is apparent that acquiescence no longer forms part of our law. [read post]
4 Aug 2017, 2:00 pm
This case (and its close cousin, United States v. [read post]
5 Feb 2014, 6:25 am
Feb. 3, 2014), and he wasn’t the first — see, for instance, this Florida trial court ruling, as well as State v. [read post]
9 Jul 2009, 10:02 pm
What one conceives well can be stated with clarity and the words to say it come easily. [read post]
25 Jun 2015, 5:22 am
. Reed v. [read post]
20 Jun 2018, 6:48 pm
Whitford and Benisek v. [read post]
17 Sep 2017, 11:34 am
Rounded to the fifth decimal place, it comes to 17.94872%. [read post]
24 Feb 2022, 9:15 am
Another round of “how far does this putatively narrow decision extend? [read post]
