Search for: "State v. Billings"
Results 4481 - 4500
of 19,726
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Nov 2009, 9:07 am
"First the general structure of this Division of the bill is divided as follows. [read post]
19 May 2023, 11:25 am
Kevin Stitt recently vetoed Oklahoma Senate Bill 429, passed by the state legislature with near unanimous bipartisan support to prohibit discriminatory graduation dress codes. [read post]
7 Mar 2017, 10:57 am
This change also was prompted by a court ruling, namely Self v. [read post]
21 Oct 2008, 5:39 pm
In State v. [read post]
14 Dec 2011, 11:19 am
Pappert (pdf, pp. 77-79) and its reliance on the Supreme Court decision of United States v. [read post]
21 Jan 2015, 10:59 am
Citizens for Environmental Responsibility v State ex rel. 14th Dist. [read post]
28 Aug 2007, 9:00 pm
In United States v. [read post]
19 May 2022, 2:04 pm
Connecticut lawmakers passed a bill (H.B. 5414) to shield providers and anyone who travels to the state for an abortion from lawsuits or out-of-state investigations and prosecutions. [read post]
25 Mar 2016, 6:13 am
S.2727: A bill to amend the Federal Water Pollution Control Act to allow preservation leasing as a form of compensatory mitigation for discharges of dredged or fill material affecting State or Indian land, and for other purposes. [read post]
30 Sep 2011, 6:54 pm
The Law Offices of James V. [read post]
8 Oct 2016, 10:16 am
In the case of Gillespie v. [read post]
1 Jun 2016, 6:22 am
” According to the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU), Member States must ensure “simultaneous and uniform” application of regulations (CJEU, 7 February 1973, Commission v. [read post]
1 Jan 2024, 2:22 pm
A federal court in California has upheld the constitutionality of the state’s Assembly Bill 587 (AB 587), which mandates social media companies to submit to the state attorney general semi-annual reports detailing their content moderation practices. [read post]
1 Mar 2016, 3:39 am
United States and the judicial-recusal case Williams v. [read post]
29 Apr 2015, 11:37 am
Here, Plaintiff did not allege that it had obtained approval for additional work or that timely billed for the work, but these omissions were not fatal to the claim. [read post]
3 Jun 2011, 3:38 am
At paragraph 134, it stated that: “It will be for the Respondent state to implement . . . appropriate general and/or individual measures to fulfil its obligations to secure the rights of the applications and other persons in their position to respect for their private life. [read post]
20 Sep 2022, 7:00 am
As the Supreme Court of Canada stated in Crookes v. [read post]
5 Nov 2007, 1:00 pm
Co.Summary of Ruling Below--Notice of appeal whose caption states "Bill G. [read post]
13 Jul 2009, 8:39 am
Opponents of the death penalty in many other states, and in Congress, have been floating similar legislation since 1987, when the Supreme Court handed down an influential decision in a case known as McCleskey v. [read post]
18 Aug 2014, 4:00 am
In Fadeyeva v. [read post]
