Search for: "State v. C. S." Results 4481 - 4500 of 37,715
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 Dec 2021, 7:30 am by Public Employment Law Press
Under these circumstances, opined the Appellate Division, Plaintiff substantially prevailed within the meaning of Public Officers Law §89(4)(c), citing Matter of Madeiros v New York State Educ. [read post]
7 Dec 2021, 7:30 am by Public Employment Law Press
Under these circumstances, opined the Appellate Division, Plaintiff substantially prevailed within the meaning of Public Officers Law §89(4)(c), citing Matter of Madeiros v New York State Educ. [read post]
6 Dec 2021, 5:59 pm by James Romoser
On Tuesday, the Supreme Court will delve into that question in United States v. [read post]
6 Dec 2021, 11:18 am by Dennis Crouch
  In particular, the statute states plainly that venue is proper in any judicial district: (3) a defendant not resident in the United States may be sued in any judicial district … 28 USC 1391(c)(3). [read post]
6 Dec 2021, 5:23 am by Jocelyn Hutton
Basfar v Wong, heard 13th-14th October Her Majesty’s Attorney General v Crosland, heard 18th October Secretary of State for the Home Department v SC (Jamaica), heard 19th October Commissioners for Her Majesty’s Revenue and Customs v Coal Staff Superannuation Scheme Trustees Ltd, heard 26th October Harpur Trust v Brazel, heard 9th November 2021 FirstPort Property Services Ltd v Settlers Court RTM Company and… [read post]
6 Dec 2021, 5:01 am by Devin DeBacker
“[A]nnually report[s] to Congress on cybersecurity threats and issues facing the United States. [read post]
5 Dec 2021, 4:39 pm by INFORRM
DLA Piper has produced a helpful summary of the European Data Protection Board’s (EDPR) draft Guidelines on the Interplay between the application of Article 3 and the provision on international transfers as per Chapter V of the  GDPR. [read post]
4 Dec 2021, 11:03 am by Gene Takagi
See IRC §§3401(c); 3121(d)(1), 3306(i). [read post]
Unreasoned or Arbitrary Reductions in Attorney’s Fees Awarded Under the Consumer Fraud Act Threaten Consumers’ Access to Justice In order to promote uniformity and fairness across the State and to increase access to justice for Illinois’ consumers, the Third District should join its four sister Districts and formally adopt the statutory fee-shifting framework arising out of the United States Supreme Court’s decision in Hensley v. [read post]
2 Dec 2021, 8:41 am by Krzysztof Pacula
This question lies at the heart of the request for a preliminary ruling lodged by French Cour de Cassation before the Court of Justice in the case V A and Z A, C-645/20. [read post]