Search for: "State v. Chance"
Results 4481 - 4500
of 12,138
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Aug 2016, 11:12 am
The parties stipulated in January 2015 that his conviction was on appeal, but it has since been affirmed, see State v. [read post]
12 Aug 2016, 10:46 am
And if outside experts are precluded from participation because they don’t have a TS/SCI clearance, then democratic oversight of the intelligence community doesn’t stand much chance. [read post]
12 Aug 2016, 6:08 am
Hobby Lobby and Zubik v. [read post]
12 Aug 2016, 4:00 am
Roughly 15 years ago, in Wilder v. [read post]
11 Aug 2016, 6:17 pm
In that prosecution, the United States Patent and Trademark Office had initially refused registration because other financial institutions had already registered loyalt [read post]
11 Aug 2016, 3:41 pm
Oracle v. [read post]
11 Aug 2016, 12:47 pm
Steuben as having any chance for certiorari. [read post]
10 Aug 2016, 11:35 am
State v. [read post]
10 Aug 2016, 11:08 am
This was not the case in the recent decision of Burgess v. [read post]
9 Aug 2016, 10:00 pm
"This was one of the first requests for fees filed after the Supreme Court ruling inKirtsaeng v. [read post]
9 Aug 2016, 2:30 pm
(A&P’s full trade name) v. [read post]
8 Aug 2016, 2:13 pm
” If you recall, in my case Eells v. [read post]
7 Aug 2016, 4:42 pm
In Connolly v. [read post]
7 Aug 2016, 2:35 pm
On the engagement of Art 8, Kugathas v The Secretary of State for the Home Department [2003] EWCA Civ 31 was followed, per Seldley LJ: “Mr. [read post]
6 Aug 2016, 8:09 am
The Federal Court of Appeal recently had a chance to review a decision by the Occupational Health and Safety Officer on the question of who should be in charge of investigating when an employee makes a workplace violence complaint in the case of Canada (Attorney General) v PSAC. [read post]
5 Aug 2016, 7:08 pm
Under the New Jersey state constitution (as in nearly all other states) the state can only take property for a “public use,” and only if it is authorized by the legislature. [read post]
5 Aug 2016, 3:37 am
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit decided last week in Hively v. [read post]
3 Aug 2016, 9:06 am
” In stating its position on what “likely to cause substantial injury” meant, the FTC ruled that they must take into account not just the likelihood that the harm will occur, but also the magnitude of the harm. [read post]
3 Aug 2016, 7:05 am
USERRA states there is no statute of limitations for bringing a USERRA claim and no imposition of court costs or fees may be charged to a USERRA plaintiff. [read post]
3 Aug 2016, 4:51 am
Posted by Charles Sartain Longoria v. [read post]
