Search for: "State v. Good Bear"
Results 4481 - 4500
of 5,195
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Mar 2010, 4:01 am
Industries brought an action before the Court of First Instance, which held that the Board of Appeal had wrongly stated that the marks at issue were clearly distinct. [read post]
28 Mar 2010, 11:30 pm
In Foley v. [read post]
28 Mar 2010, 9:17 am
In my own view, federalism bears very little relationship to libertarianism. [read post]
24 Mar 2010, 10:19 pm
Spy/Cat v. [read post]
23 Mar 2010, 6:22 am
Most recently, in Gonzales v. [read post]
22 Mar 2010, 4:28 am
(Chicago IP Litigation Blog) Patent Compliance Group - First false marking declaratory judgment action filed: North States Indus., Inc. v. [read post]
21 Mar 2010, 5:09 pm
Closely held companies are creatures of state law, and state laws on these issues are not uniform. [read post]
18 Mar 2010, 4:09 pm
An interesting case, Syed v. [read post]
18 Mar 2010, 11:12 am
§ 3500.14(g)(2) (“If the payment of a thing of value bears no reasonable relationship to the market value of the goods or services provided, then the excess is not for services or goods actually performed or provided. [read post]
18 Mar 2010, 6:09 am
All of these people I regard as not just having acted in good faith, but having mostly got it right under very difficult circumstances. [read post]
18 Mar 2010, 4:50 am
United States v. [read post]
17 Mar 2010, 10:31 pm
One would think that the Court would be sensitive this reality after deciding Caperton v. [read post]
17 Mar 2010, 4:19 pm
Please bear with me. [read post]
17 Mar 2010, 1:28 pm
In London v. [read post]
11 Mar 2010, 1:42 pm
Co. v. [read post]
10 Mar 2010, 3:52 pm
See, e.g., Du Charme v. [read post]
10 Mar 2010, 12:29 am
The case, Lawyers Funds for Client Protection v. [read post]
8 Mar 2010, 4:36 pm
United States (Copyright Litigation Blog) (Property, intangible) US Trade Marks – Decisions Precedential No. 7: TTAB deems internet printouts admissible via notice of reliance: Safer, Inc v OMS Investments, Inc (TTABlog) TTAB vacates 2008 fraud ruling in Herbaceuticals, Inc v Xel Pharmaceuticals, Inc (TTABlog) TTAB affirms 2(d) refusal of CARMINE’S design for restaurant services in view of two other CARMINE’S designs: In re Carmine's Broadway… [read post]
8 Mar 2010, 4:36 pm
United States (Copyright Litigation Blog) (Property, intangible) US Trade Marks – Decisions Precedential No. 7: TTAB deems internet printouts admissible via notice of reliance: Safer, Inc v OMS Investments, Inc (TTABlog) TTAB vacates 2008 fraud ruling in Herbaceuticals, Inc v Xel Pharmaceuticals, Inc (TTABlog) TTAB affirms 2(d) refusal of CARMINE’S design for restaurant services in view of two other CARMINE’S designs: In re Carmine's Broadway… [read post]
8 Mar 2010, 4:56 am
Since one legal tests of trademark infringement is customer confusion, you be the judge: Are the marks confusing enough that customers might think products bearing them are from the same source? [read post]
