Search for: "State v. Law"
Results 4481 - 4500
of 173,814
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Mar 2024, 7:10 am
"Whether the 'loser pays' provision undermines Vidal's ability to vindicate his rights here as a matter of substantive federal law or state law presents a serious question of law and fact that requires more detailed findings about Vidal's finances, the potential costs of arbitration, and the possibility that Vidal will incur such costs. [read post]
11 Mar 2024, 6:55 am
” United States v. [read post]
11 Mar 2024, 6:30 am
” I have chided my friends Pam Karlen, Sam Issacharoff, and Richard Pildes for titling their widely used casebook on election law The Law of Democracy. [read post]
11 Mar 2024, 6:17 am
Co. v. [read post]
11 Mar 2024, 5:01 am
From Moore v. [read post]
11 Mar 2024, 4:38 am
Speagle v. [read post]
11 Mar 2024, 4:00 am
In Bostock v. [read post]
11 Mar 2024, 12:15 am
Palkon v. [read post]
10 Mar 2024, 9:05 pm
Md. 2023), available at https://www.justice.gov/atr/case/usv-cargill-meat-solutions-corp-et-al. [6] United States v. [read post]
10 Mar 2024, 5:04 pm
Professor Kate Sang has received £15,000 after the Secretary of State for Science, Innovation and Technology, Michelle Donelan, wrongly accused her of supporting Hamas. [read post]
10 Mar 2024, 5:01 pm
The marriage was not registered with the state authorities in Ukraine. [read post]
10 Mar 2024, 2:56 pm
In future blogs, we will post about the legal challenges to the Final Rule, including the case already filed by ten states in federal court in the 11th Circuit where West Virginia is the lead plaintiff (.. déjà vu West Virginia v. [read post]
10 Mar 2024, 12:39 pm
That right is conferred by section 27A, and it is protected both by the common law right to a fair hearing and by Article 6(1) of the ECHR, which states: “In the determination of his civil rights and obligations or of any criminal charge against him, everyone is entitled to a fair and public hearing within a reasonable time by an independent and impartial tribunal established by law”. [read post]
10 Mar 2024, 12:23 pm
by Dennis Crouch In January 2024 a then-secret order from US Customs and Border Protection (CPB) had a major impact in the Masimo v. [read post]
10 Mar 2024, 8:43 am
Reminder of IPKat event ‘(Re-)discovering the copyright basics – Originality after THJ v Sheridan’ (14 March)The IPKat is thrilled to announce that, in the evening of 14 March 2024, a stellar panel has been gathered to discuss the Court of Appeal of England and Wales judgment in THJ v Sheridan [2023] EWCA Civ 1354 regarding copyright originality in certain graphic user interfaces (GUIs). [read post]
10 Mar 2024, 7:51 am
Do No Harm, a nationwide membership organization, filed suit against Pfizer on behalf of its members, alleging that Pfizer unlawfully excludes white and Asian-American applicants from the Fellowship in violation of federal and state laws. [read post]
10 Mar 2024, 7:42 am
At every level of government in the United States (and often in other countries), there are laws that empower the public to file requests for public records. [read post]
10 Mar 2024, 6:30 am
I also think that Congress has similar authority to address the problem in elections for state office, though I realize that this is a more contested view (including for reasons set out in Oregon v. [read post]
9 Mar 2024, 6:42 pm
Certainly it subjects its approach to questions of bias (negative) or political instrumentalism (neutral or to expected from a state organ). [read post]
9 Mar 2024, 1:30 pm
The United States District Court for the Northern District of California, in Heller v. [read post]
