Search for: "State v. Marks"
Results 4481 - 4500
of 19,483
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Feb 2017, 6:54 am
Art 104 of the Regulation states:(1) A Community trade mark court hearing an action referred to in Article 96 [i.e. counterclaims for revocation/declaration of invalidity], other than an action for declaration of non-infringement, shall, unless there are special grounds for continuing the hearing, of its own volition, after hearing the parties, or at the request of one of the parties and after hearing the other party, stay the proceedings where the validity of the Community trade… [read post]
19 Apr 2013, 8:51 am
State v. [read post]
20 May 2024, 4:00 am
/Idaho v. [read post]
4 Oct 2013, 5:16 am
See United States v. [read post]
13 Jun 2011, 1:36 pm
The Learning Company v. [read post]
11 Apr 2025, 5:08 am
The words “legal malpractice” are mentioned only in passing, yet Medical Supply of NY Corp. v State Farm Mut. [read post]
26 May 2023, 2:23 pm
” This omission marks a significant oversight by the Court. [read post]
30 May 2008, 11:23 am
" In State of Indiana v. [read post]
15 May 2010, 7:56 am
Kaliku v. [read post]
10 Apr 2025, 6:24 am
[ix] E.g., United States v. [read post]
12 Sep 2013, 1:01 pm
Additionally, as a practical matter, some service providers already require a search warrant before disclosing stored content to law enforcement based on the Sixth Circuit’s 2010 decision in United States v. [read post]
15 May 2023, 12:00 am
The post Case Review – High Performance Energy Systems Inc v. [read post]
3 May 2007, 1:14 pm
The case is 134 Original, New Jersey v. [read post]
5 Jul 2012, 7:59 am
The Advocate-General's Opinion has just issued in Case C-149/11 Leno Merken v Hagelkruis Beheer B.V., better known as the ONEL/OMEL case. [read post]
30 Dec 2011, 6:13 am
Starbucks Corp. v. [read post]
12 Sep 2012, 5:14 pm
Citing Anderson v. [read post]
7 Dec 2014, 3:29 pm
Merpel has heard that the Administrative Council will discuss such a plan next week, and can’t wait to know non-EU contracting states’ reaction to the idea of the CJEU resolving their disputes. [read post]
12 Jun 2022, 4:57 am
One might have thought that, given the Grand Chamber’s judgment in Bayatyan v Armenia [2011] ECHR 1095, states parties would have got the message by now. [read post]
18 May 2010, 9:41 am
[Baures v. [read post]
Eleventh Circuit Notes Split Re Standard of Review for a District Court's Denial of a Franks Hearing
17 Jun 2009, 3:33 am
See United States v. [read post]
