Search for: "State v. So "
Results 4481 - 4500
of 117,863
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 May 2011, 1:00 pm
In the event that extradition is denied on that basis, Article 3(2) requires the Requested State to submit the case to its competent authorities for the purpose of prosecution if the Requesting State so requests and if the laws of the Requested State so allow. [read post]
2 Sep 2007, 9:57 am
State v. [read post]
29 Oct 2008, 10:14 am
The current state of the law on pre-nuptial agreements received a pretty thorough airing in the case of NG v KR (Pre-nuptial contract) [2008] EWHC 1532 (Fam). [read post]
29 Sep 2019, 8:54 pm
This hardly seemed fair, so the United States Supreme Court in the classic case of Illinois Brick v. [read post]
10 Nov 2017, 2:00 pm
It's a (judicial) holiday today, so no opinions. [read post]
6 Oct 2023, 11:53 am
The AUSAs are so much better funded, the prosecutors are so vigorous, the sentences are so long, and (critically) in federal court you've got to actually serve at least 85% of your sentence whereas in state court you generally only serve half (with good behavior).It almost seems like piling on; just adding to the indignities and practical harms that arise from relegating Native Americans to isolated reservations.Now, again, in these particular cases, I get… [read post]
27 Oct 2007, 2:25 pm
Reporting on yesterday's COA decision in the case of State of Indiana v. [read post]
2 Nov 2011, 11:49 am
More on eyewitness ID from the states will be in the next post. [read post]
13 Mar 2013, 7:24 pm
See Natalini v. [read post]
25 Mar 2009, 9:10 am
P. 52(b)’s plain-error standard for unpreserved claims of error; and held that, although the error had occurred and was obvious, Puckett had not satisfied the third prong of plain-error analysis in that he failed to demonstrate that his ultimate sentence was affected, especially since the judge had found that acceptance-of-responsibility reductions for defendants who continued to engage in criminal activity were so rare as "to be unknown. [read post]
10 Apr 2012, 10:34 am
See United States v. [read post]
16 Mar 2023, 4:30 am
Supreme Court to which Westlaw has assigned “Not Followed on State Law Grounds” tags (so far), about a thirtieth of the 29,956 cases in Harold J. [read post]
9 Jan 2012, 10:30 am
Today the United States Supreme Court will hear oral argument in Sackett v. [read post]
7 Jun 2023, 6:05 am
However, in Rucho v. [read post]
7 Apr 2008, 8:21 am
So why not just overrule Gould and give the states the same spending power that Dole gives to the feds? [read post]
4 Dec 2014, 9:01 pm
Background on the King v. [read post]
17 Mar 2015, 9:33 am
Levanoff, et al. v. [read post]
12 Dec 2011, 2:49 pm
(That doesn’t mean there are none; if the state knows where a witness is and ihttp://www.blogger.com/img/blank.gift can invoke a formal procedure to secure her presence, then it should do so; this is Barber v. [read post]
7 Mar 2015, 10:15 am
And even then, they have only been invalidated when the condition is so severe that it amounts to a “gun to the head,” as Chief Justice Roberts put it in NFIB v. [read post]
30 Apr 2022, 8:55 am
Alphabet LinkedIn Isn’t a State Actor–Perez v. [read post]
