Search for: "T-UP v. Consumer Protection" Results 4481 - 4500 of 4,766
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 Nov 2008, 1:36 pm
Don’t give up (International Law Office) Morocco Morocco hopes to benefit from Iranian technology expertise (Afro-IP) Netherlands Medical aid association Eers [read post]
21 Nov 2008, 12:13 pm
(Michael Geist) Google agrees to pay $125 million to authors and publishers affected by Google Print service, settling copyright litigation (Ars Technica) Google is done paying Silicon Valley’s legal bills (EFF) Apple bends to studios, adds copyright protection to MacBooks (Wired) Website parodying Union Square Partnership shut down due to bogus cybersquatting and copyright infringement claims (EFF) Singers Daryl Hall and John Oates sue Warner/Chappell Music for failing to sue… [read post]
20 Nov 2008, 2:00 pm
  But  businesses aren't immune from stirring up wacky litigation, either. [read post]
13 Nov 2008, 1:52 pm
Last week, the day the case came down, we threw up a quick post with our very preliminary thoughts about Conte v. [read post]
11 Nov 2008, 5:43 am
  The fear of losing supply triggers consumers to fill up more frequently, causing long lines at stations. [read post]
5 Nov 2008, 10:06 pm
Distinctiveness which is geographically limited can anyway be protected by the law of passing off, which doesn't quite have the same sledgehammer effect on traders in identical goods as registered trade mark law. [read post]
3 Nov 2008, 7:50 pm
She noted that some briefs had indicated that the FDA believed that tort suits are a helpful adjunct to the FDA's efforts to protect consumers. [read post]
29 Oct 2008, 9:55 pm
It is a victory for consumers and creators alike. [read post]
25 Oct 2008, 12:18 am
(IP Think Tank) A defining time for the IP market (IAM) Busting an intellectual capital myth (Pat Sullivan’s Blog) Governments, financial stakeholders meet on policy for IP as collateral (Intellectual Property Watch) (IP finance) How much should you spend on start-up marketing? [read post]
23 Oct 2008, 4:26 pm
First, I don't think that there are enough consumer law cases such that state court judges would be extremely familiar with them. [read post]
23 Oct 2008, 4:26 pm
First, I don't think that there are enough consumer law cases such that state court judges would be extremely familiar with them. [read post]
17 Oct 2008, 8:56 am
For the unitiated, supplementary protection certificates (or "SPCs" as they are lovingly called by their ardent admirers) are means by which patents for many pharmaceutical and plant protection patents can be extended for up to five years, to make up for the fact that so much marketing time is lost to patent owners when products made under those patents are rigorously tested for efficacy and side effects.Right: SPC -- meet the Samurai Pizza CatsFor this… [read post]
15 Oct 2008, 3:02 pm
"Unelected federal regulators are now claiming that states can't protect their own citizens with stronger consumer protections," Weisbrod added. [read post]
11 Oct 2008, 3:07 am
(Laurence Kaye on Digital Media Law) EU Parliament passes 'Telecom Package' - only judges can order net disconnections (Ars Technica) Extraction and databases - the ECJ rules in Directmedia Publishing GmbH v Albert-Ludwigs- Universität Freiburg (IPKat) Google refuses to submit to Europe's data protection regime (IMPACT) Germany Court tells P2P company RapidShare that it must proactively monitor content for infringement (Ars … [read post]
8 Oct 2008, 11:55 am
The case is U.S. v. [read post]
8 Oct 2008, 11:50 am
We didn't garner a single vote in American Home Products Corp. v. [read post]