Search for: "The People v. Cross" Results 4481 - 4500 of 6,172
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 Nov 2011, 4:05 pm by INFORRM
Senior people are above this childish, vain practice of peer review. [read post]
22 Nov 2011, 7:48 am by Bexis
Social media to which many people have access has no reasonable expectation of privacy.Beye v. [read post]
22 Nov 2011, 5:00 am by Wystan M. Ackerman
  I asked, if insurers were to move towards increased use of arbitration following AT&T v. [read post]
21 Nov 2011, 1:16 pm by Lovechilde
Counteracting the 2010 Citizens United case and the 1976 Buckley v. [read post]
20 Nov 2011, 6:06 pm by Brian Shiffrin
We note, however, that such questions were improper (see People v Paul, 229 AD2d 932; People v Paul, 212 AD2d 1020, 1021, lv denied 85 NY2d 912; People v Edwards, 167 AD2d 864, lv denied 77 NY2d 877). [read post]
20 Nov 2011, 5:00 pm by Brian Shiffrin
Thus, the government employees who prepared the records were “not defendant's accuser[s]' in any but the most attenuated sense”, and the breath test documents were properly admitted in evidence over defendant's objection based on the Confrontation Clause (internal citations omitted).It should be noted that some local courts have held otherwise (People v Carreira, 27 Misc3d [Watertown City Ct 2010]; People v. [read post]
19 Nov 2011, 2:46 pm by Joyce Sweinberg, Esquire
v=iEIuXb1c9rQBoth person, animal and property can suffer significant damage from collisions with deer. [read post]
14 Nov 2011, 9:19 am by jpfaff
" Furthermore, how do we know when we cross the "sufficiently substantial" risk of bias line? [read post]
13 Nov 2011, 6:23 pm
In approximately 2% of the car v. deer collisions there is a fatality. [read post]
11 Nov 2011, 8:31 am by Joel R. Brandes
The parties made several motions and cross motions for relief. [read post]