Search for: "U. S. v. Mays"
Results 4481 - 4500
of 7,531
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Apr 2020, 2:07 pm
Alternatively, an employer may engage in its state’s short-time compensation program (also known as shared-work or work share programs), under which an employee can receive partial wages and partial regular unemployment benefits—thereby preserving the employee’s eligibility for the $600 FPUC benefit. [read post]
31 May 2020, 4:22 pm
U. [read post]
16 Jul 2015, 7:11 am
Summary judgment was affirmed, however, on his national origin and religious discrimination claims (Yazdian v. [read post]
18 Apr 2015, 3:44 pm
Next, the record of the proceeding before the Support Magistrate on May 15, 2009 indicates no request by petitioner's counsel on his behalf for a finding of a credit due to the petitioner for overpayments made from December 15, 2008 until May 15, 2009. [read post]
29 Jun 2009, 10:16 am
S. 469, 500; see also Wygant v. [read post]
22 Oct 2015, 8:00 pm
Gentry v. [read post]
30 Dec 2013, 3:11 am
Ruggiero, 2013 NY Slip Op 31955(U) (Sup Ct Suffolk County July 29, 2013), in which Suffolk County Justice Emily Pines opted for one appraiser’s income approach over the other appraiser’s market approach in a stock valuation contest involving a family-owned kosher deli. [read post]
10 Jun 2021, 12:25 pm
The Court also found that the signs are conceptually different, since a stylized letter ‘h’, or two interlaced letters ‘u’, could be perceived in Huawei’s mark, whilst the stylized letters of the initials of Chanel’s founder (Coco Chanel) can be discerned in Chanel’s mark.Thus, the General Court held that the marks at issue are different. [read post]
2 May 2022, 3:00 am
There, an investigator obtained a search warrant for a suspect’s bank records on April 22 and had it delivered to the bank on April 23, but did not receive the records from the bank until May 6. [read post]
15 Aug 2020, 4:29 am
Slip Op. 50825(U)(Fam Ct.,2020) the Court observed that the purpose of a forensic evaluation in court for purposes of therapeutic interventions Cthat is the parents= responsibility. [read post]
11 Jun 2018, 4:32 am
Just two weeks ago, in Shawe v Elting, 2018 NY Slip Op 03644 [1st Dept May 22, 2018], the Appellate Division – First Department affirmed Justice Kornreich’s dismissal decision in all respects. [read post]
8 Oct 2008, 8:00 pm
McDonald, Todd S. [read post]
21 Jun 2012, 2:00 pm
13 (hereinafter U. [read post]
10 Jul 2024, 8:37 pm
” Galbreath v. [read post]
20 Mar 2019, 6:00 pm
This post will review the court’s opinion in State v. [read post]
27 May 2021, 3:49 am
In AMG Capital Management, LLC v. [read post]
20 Nov 2011, 6:00 am
Tompkins and Miranda v. [read post]
1 Jun 2015, 5:42 am
(`[T]he Government may not exceed the scope of the private search unless it has the right to make an independent search’).U.S. v. [read post]
3 Mar 2023, 10:24 am
(Citing Save Berkeley’s Neighborhoods v. [read post]
