Search for: "United States v. Marks"
Results 4481 - 4500
of 9,517
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Mar 2010, 12:11 pm
Drumbl, Prosecution of Genocide v. the Fair Trial Principle: Comments on Brown and others v. [read post]
12 Nov 2014, 9:55 pm
(See Luzano v. [read post]
16 Nov 2017, 10:10 am
Sarah Grant provided an update on the United States v. al-Nashiri proceedings. [read post]
27 Mar 2017, 4:18 am
At Education Week, Mark Walsh reports on the court’s decision on Wednesday in Star Athletica, LLC v. [read post]
16 Aug 2012, 11:11 am
In Martin et al. v. [read post]
3 Aug 2009, 6:18 am
GMBH v Geox SPA (PatLit) (Gray on Claims) EWHC (Pat): PPDs and piecemeal litigation: MMI Research Ltd v Cellxion Ltd & Ors (PatLit) EWHC: When anticompetition spices up competition, greyhounds lose their appeal: Bookmakers’ Afternoon Greyhound Services Ltd & Ors v Amalgamated Racing & Ors (IPKat) LOCOG demands Olympic Removals stop using Olympic symbol (IPKat) Infringing goods in transit: are patents more efficacious than trade… [read post]
4 Sep 2012, 3:36 am
The next day comes the argument in United States v. [read post]
31 Jan 2011, 6:20 pm
(p. 60) In light of [United States v. [read post]
8 Sep 2013, 11:00 am
But jurisdictional objections are another matter, as the United States explains in its opposition brief: 1. [read post]
1 Jan 2019, 9:01 pm
This amendment set out New YorkState's response to the United States Supreme Court's decision in Janus v American Federation of State, County, and Municipal Employees, Council 31, et al, 138 SCt 2448.In Janus the high court held that states and public-sector unions may no longer require "nonconsenting employees" in a collective bargaining unit to pay an "agency shop fee" in lieu of becoming a member the certified or… [read post]
1 Jan 2019, 9:01 pm
This amendment set out New YorkState's response to the United States Supreme Court's decision in Janus v American Federation of State, County, and Municipal Employees, Council 31, et al, 138 SCt 2448.In Janus the high court held that states and public-sector unions may no longer require "nonconsenting employees" in a collective bargaining unit to pay an "agency shop fee" in lieu of becoming a member the certified or… [read post]
29 Oct 2015, 10:55 am
In her visit to Beijing, German chancellor Angela Merkel suggested that the United States and Chi [read post]
1 Mar 2023, 4:05 pm
With this history in mind, along with (i) foundational principles of state judicial practice and (ii) the shortcomings of the United States Supreme Court’s approach to fractured opinions in Marks v. [read post]
20 Jan 2025, 6:30 am
Youngstown marked a high point of functionalist reasoning in the Court’ adjudication of separation of powers questions. [read post]
12 May 2020, 4:05 am
At Dorf on Law, Michael Dorf pushes back against Justice Clarence Thomas’ originalist critique of the First Amendment overbreadth doctrine in a concurrence last week in United States v. [read post]
19 Dec 2018, 9:21 am
In Lee v. [read post]
2 Nov 2016, 4:56 am
Yesterday, the court heard arguments in State Farm Fire & Casualty Co. v. [read post]
7 Oct 2019, 11:12 am
Picasso case (United States District Court for the Northern District of California). [read post]
4 Dec 2023, 9:10 am
Background On 17 February 2022, the United States Olympic and Paralympic Committee (‘USOPC’) designated the EU in its IR no. 1645605 for the sign ‘TEAM USA’. [read post]
25 Jan 2012, 12:50 pm
United States, doesn’t touch the constitutional issues brewing in the lower courts. [read post]
