Search for: "Walkes v. State" Results 4481 - 4500 of 7,520
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 May 2013, 2:54 pm by Florian Mueller
However, the European Commission's preliminary assessment is that the license agreement underlying that rate-setting case came into being under anticompetitive circumstances, calling into question whether there even is an enforceable agreement in place.Alternatively to a process in Germany, Google "suggest[ed] the [arbitration] panel [in the United States] employ a 'baseball arbitration' procedure to resolve any areas in which the parties are unable to reach agreement" (emphasis mine). [read post]
2 May 2013, 11:00 am by Paul Rosenzweig
  This question is very much on our minds these days after the GPS case from last term — United States v. [read post]
1 May 2013, 8:56 pm by Benjamin Wittes
The reader might miss Siems’s subtle acknowledgement later on (which he does not quite state directly) that Robertson’s opinion was vacated by the D.C. [read post]
28 Apr 2013, 2:49 pm by Florian Mueller
Robart of the United States District Court for the Western District of Washington published his FRAND rate-setting decision in the Microsoft v. [read post]
26 Apr 2013, 9:03 am by Rebecca Tushnet
Prone to certification even after Wal-Mart v. [read post]
24 Apr 2013, 11:43 am by Lyle Denniston
Hearing the case of Metrish v. [read post]
23 Apr 2013, 10:01 pm by Gina Bongiovi
In this video series, I am going to walk you through the process of running a business in Las Vegas, from naming your business to opening your doors. [read post]
19 Apr 2013, 3:20 pm by Jon Sands
The defendant kept walking. [read post]
15 Apr 2013, 7:56 am by INFORRM
In Vernon Kay v Reveal, the television and radio presenter Vernon Kay complained through his representatives, Hackford Jones, about the accuracy of an article headlined “Vernon’s still walking on eggshells“, published in Reveal magazine in July 2013. [read post]
15 Apr 2013, 7:43 am by The Charge
A similar due process analysis governed the case in United States v. [read post]