Search for: "*u.s. v. Chang"
Results 4501 - 4520
of 24,080
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 Aug 2010, 12:17 am
I think such a conviction would be permissible, even if the couple never actually had sex (they were interrupted, or the woman changed her mind), even if counterspeech was possible (an ex-girlfriend who knew the truth was in the next room), and even if there was no "clear and present danger" of transmission because the couple always intended to use a condom, transmission rates are uncertain, sex was only to commence after the movie they were watching ended, etc. [read post]
1 Aug 2007, 5:15 am
"The Committee on Financial Services of the U.S. [read post]
7 Oct 2014, 9:14 am
Media coverage of the immediate aftermath of the U.S. [read post]
7 Aug 2019, 12:46 pm
Vishnu Kannan shared the Department of Justice’s amicus brief in Trump v. [read post]
27 Aug 2010, 11:58 am
In AEP, a panel of the U.S. [read post]
14 Sep 2020, 2:00 am
In the wake of the U.S. [read post]
14 Sep 2020, 2:00 am
In the wake of the U.S. [read post]
17 Feb 2015, 9:01 pm
Last month, the U.S. [read post]
5 Nov 2008, 1:57 pm
The evolution of technology and the potential degree of intrusion changes the analysis.In re U.S., supra. [read post]
4 Mar 2009, 12:01 pm
In the other case, however, Martinez v. [read post]
1 Jun 2017, 9:22 am
Wasserman Rajec* In Impression Products, Inc. v. [read post]
27 Mar 2017, 3:09 pm
The U.S. [read post]
3 Jan 2023, 12:15 am
McDonald v. [read post]
3 Dec 2015, 12:51 pm
Now, the Florida Supreme Court has changed that in the recent case of Joerg v. [read post]
29 Jun 2010, 12:48 pm
” (Compare Craig v. [read post]
20 Jun 2011, 10:11 pm
If we needed any more proof, we now have Wal-Mart v. [read post]
9 Feb 2024, 7:29 am
The U.S. [read post]
25 Jan 2014, 8:47 pm
During arguments in Paroline v. [read post]
4 Mar 2015, 6:49 am
State v. [read post]
23 May 2009, 4:05 am
Twombly, 550 U.S. 544 (2007). [read post]
