Search for: "Arizona Supreme Court" Results 4501 - 4520 of 9,057
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 Jun 2015, 2:50 pm by Marc Climaco
As the country awaits a decision from the Supreme Court on marriage equality, anti-LGBT forces who want to use religion to allow discrimination have pushed bills through in Michigan and North Carolina. [read post]
8 Aug 2013, 6:04 am by Staci Zaretsky
They can only do that in Arizona. [read post]
16 Aug 2017, 5:45 am by Staci Zaretsky
Neal Katyal of Hogan Lovells has asked the Supreme Court to hear an Arizona death row inmate's case, arguing that the state's death penalty law is unconstitutional and that it must be struck down. [read post]
21 Oct 2016, 7:49 am
Flake's comments come as the Senate GOP weighs how to deal with a Clinton nomination to the Supreme Court. [read post]
3 Nov 2016, 10:00 am
In June 2013, the Supreme Court ruled that Arizona may not require voters who use a federal voter registration form to provide citizenship documents but rather must register such voters so long as they swear under oath that they are U.S. citizens. [read post]
16 Jan 2009, 10:06 pm
But those courts avoid excluding the illegally obtained evidence by extending an earlier Supreme Court decision, Arizona v. [read post]
7 Jun 2007, 7:42 am
  LINKNo one on the Supreme Court publicly opposes the death penalty, but four justices often side with death row inmates who are fighting to avoid execution. [read post]
9 Oct 2011, 4:23 pm by Matt Brown
The court quoted the Supreme Court of the United States about how experienced advocates trim weaker arguments on appeal and focus on the best issue instead. [read post]
2 Mar 2009, 10:13 pm
  Will a circuit, or even the Supremes, take this issue by the horns and address it at the point where the problem arises, or will courts continue to try to sneak around the back to circumvent the problem? [read post]
28 Feb 2022, 7:02 am by Abbe R. Gluck
Moore, an early CSA decision in which the Supreme Court confirmed that “registered physicians can be prosecuted under the CSA when their activities fall outside the usual course of professional practice. [read post]
21 Jan 2016, 1:46 pm by Kent Scheidegger
Arizona, 536 U.S. 584, 597-598, n. 4 (2002) very explicitly confines its jury trial holding to the eligibility decision, i.e., the finding of at least one aggravating circumstance, and not to the weighing or the ultimate penalty decision.Did the Supreme Court in Hurst v. [read post]
9 Dec 2008, 1:28 pm
Iowa's state Supreme Court is hearing oral arguments this week on a challenge to the state's ban on same-sex marriage, but a decision will likely not be forthcoming for several months. [read post]
6 Feb 2015, 12:36 pm by Victoria Kwan
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit before his confirmation to the Supreme Court, spent the majority of his half-hour speech remembering his late colleague. [read post]
23 Aug 2010, 1:00 pm by Melvin N.A. Avanzado
JUDGES, ACADEMICS AND PRACTICING LAWYERS GATHER FOR YEARLY CONFERENCE The 2010 Ninth Circuit Judicial Conference took place last week in Maui, Hawaii with United States Supreme Court Associate Justice Anthony M. [read post]
27 May 2011, 6:53 am by Thomas Crocker
In a case that involves the most private of places—the home—where the Fourth Amendment has been said to draw a firm, but bright line at the threshold, the Supreme Court held that police officers may enter without a warrant when they fear the occupants might be destroying the very thing they otherwise needed consent to inspect. [read post]
27 Feb 2024, 1:15 pm by Tom Smith
The  US Supreme Court recently decided to hear an appeal from the notoriously-liberal Ninth Circuit, in a 2023 case entitled City of Grants Pass v. [read post]
2 Jul 2012, 1:21 pm by Margaret Peachy
While immigration laws have been a topic brought before the Supreme Court a number of times in the intervening 55 years, the opinion just issued by the current court on Arizona v. [read post]
14 Jul 2010, 11:41 pm by Transplanted Lawyer
In Plyler, the issue was whether the state of Texas could exclude children present in the country without documentation from attending public schools, and the Supremes said, by a 5-4 vote, no, that violates the Equal Protections Clause. [read post]