Search for: "BELL v. BELL"
Results 4501 - 4520
of 5,136
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Sep 2008, 5:27 pm
Circuit Judge Ed Carnes wrote the majority opinion, which upholds the constitutionality of such strip searches, "at least where the strip search is no more intrusive than the one the Supreme Court upheld in Bell v. [read post]
1 Sep 2008, 8:47 am
In Bell v Kelly, the Court has agreed to examine some part of this quandary. [read post]
31 Aug 2008, 4:00 am
Bell (07-1114). [read post]
30 Aug 2008, 2:14 pm
Bell (Case) House v. [read post]
29 Aug 2008, 6:52 pm
Corp. v. [read post]
29 Aug 2008, 12:44 pm
Case Name: Jacobs Ranch Coal Co. v. [read post]
29 Aug 2008, 8:25 am
" The case is titled La Casita Mexicana, Inc. v. [read post]
28 Aug 2008, 11:38 am
Per Khorrami v. [read post]
27 Aug 2008, 6:01 am
[V]irtue was in short supply, not only among the murderers, gamblers, slavers, squatters, and drunks who poured over the border from Georgia, but among the erstwhile elite. [read post]
26 Aug 2008, 11:44 am
Lane retained Richards in April 1998 to represent her on a federal court action against the Bell County School Board. [read post]
26 Aug 2008, 10:38 am
See Bell Atlantic v. [read post]
24 Aug 2008, 4:00 am
The petitioner’s merits brief is due Thursday in Pacific Bell Telephone Co. v. linkLine Communications (07-512) and Friday in Ashcroft v. [read post]
23 Aug 2008, 1:23 am
You can separately subscribe to the IP Thinktank Global week in Review at the Subscribe page: [duncanbucknell.com] Highlights this week included: DRM for streaming music dies a quiet death: (Electronic Frontier Foundation), (Techdirt) CAFC decides Apotex and Impax infringed AstraZeneca’s Prilosec patents: (Law360), (Patent Prospector), (Patent Docs), (GenericsWeb), CAFC upholds lower court’s decision finding USPTO was within its rights to subject a Cooper patent to… [read post]
21 Aug 2008, 5:02 pm
As the SCC recently confirmed in the Keays v. [read post]
21 Aug 2008, 2:58 am
” Because Lenz’s complaint contained allegations of this nature, it was detailed enough to pass Twombly muster [Bell Atlantic Corp. v. [read post]
16 Aug 2008, 2:43 am
– discussion of Washington Post article on Ismed’s efforts to promote follow-on biologics approval pathway: (Patent Baristas), (Patent Docs), US: Congressional fact-finding on follow-on biologics: (Patent Docs), US: David v Monsanto: Biotechnology patent ‘exhaustion’ after Quanta, Supreme Court petition: (Hal Wegner), US: Ulysses Pharmaceuticals announces issuance of patent for novel class of ant [read post]
15 Aug 2008, 6:36 pm
The Ninth Circuit affirmed, applying Bell Atl. [read post]
15 Aug 2008, 1:40 pm
Ed. 2d 411 (1972) (holding that the Sixth Amendment right to counsel attaches upon the commencement of formal judicial proceedings); see also City of Belle Plaine v. [read post]
14 Aug 2008, 11:54 pm
" Unfortunately, the ruling in Christian Research Institute v. [read post]
14 Aug 2008, 9:31 pm
Bell AUTHOR: Paul A. [read post]
