Search for: "Bear v. State"
Results 4501 - 4520
of 14,845
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Jul 2018, 4:00 am
" Further, the Appellate Division found that the State's "non-impairment clause" set out in Article V, §7, of the State Constitution was "not implicated as the challenged action does not involve a change directly related to retirement benefits.Considering the Petitioners' arguments challenging the "cost-cutting" measures the City elected to use "to pay for the PPL benefit," the Appellate Division held that the method… [read post]
4 Jul 2018, 11:40 am
Casey, the 1992 decision reaffirming Roe v. [read post]
3 Jul 2018, 12:02 pm
Jude Medical, Inc. v. [read post]
3 Jul 2018, 12:02 pm
Jude Medical, Inc. v. [read post]
3 Jul 2018, 5:02 am
In dissent, Justice Breyer contended that “the Government’s arguments do not come close to carrying the heavy burden that the Government bears in seeking such extraordinary relief. [read post]
2 Jul 2018, 9:30 pm
The bill broke with tradition in Britain and the empire, as it included provisions from the bill of rights of the United States. [read post]
2 Jul 2018, 8:39 am
The Court’s decision in Janus v. [read post]
2 Jul 2018, 7:25 am
” Women of color to bear the brunt? [read post]
2 Jul 2018, 6:55 am
In United States v. [read post]
2 Jul 2018, 5:21 am
” Heather Long for the Washington Post reports that Collins “said Sunday she would not vote for any judge who wanted to end access to abortion in the United States by overturning Roe v. [read post]
1 Jul 2018, 9:01 pm
The Court has applied the doctrine to bank records, in United States v. [read post]
29 Jun 2018, 7:50 am
United States v. [read post]
28 Jun 2018, 3:47 pm
FOSTA vastly magnifies the risk an Internet host bears of being sued. [read post]
28 Jun 2018, 3:39 pm
See Jordan v. [read post]
28 Jun 2018, 10:12 am
We reinstate the jury’s verdict and the award of $3 million in punitive damages against GES,” the court document stated, in part. [read post]
28 Jun 2018, 9:38 am
In Commonwealth v. [read post]
28 Jun 2018, 3:09 am
“The fact that the right to keep and bear arms appears in the Constitution should not obscure the novelty of the Court’s decision to enforce that right against the States. [read post]
27 Jun 2018, 2:27 pm
On the last possible decision day, the Supreme Court issued a 5-4 decision in Florida v. [read post]
27 Jun 2018, 10:25 am
By tomorrow, the California legislature likely will pass a sweeping, lengthy, overly-complicated, and poorly-constructed privacy law that will have ripple effects throughout the world. [read post]
27 Jun 2018, 1:16 am
A proprietor can oppose the further commercialisation of pharmaceutical products imported from another Member State in its original internal and external packaging with an additional external label applied by the importer, unless:(i) it is established that the use of the trade mark rights by the proprietor thereof to oppose the marketing of the relabelled products under that trade mark would contribute to the artificial partitioning of the markets between Member States; (ii) it is… [read post]
