Search for: "Black v. United States"
Results 4501 - 4520
of 4,858
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Dec 2008, 11:39 am
The text - following on the heels of the Citizenship Clause's grant of national birthright citizenship - provides that "[n]o State shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States. [read post]
4 Dec 2008, 3:23 pm
United States v. [read post]
28 Nov 2008, 12:14 pm
– Tackling music piracy in Africa (Afro-IP) Australia Patent infringement and account of profits: Black & Decker Inc v GMCA Pty Ltd (No 5) (IP Down Under) MONSTER ENERGY keeps battling: Hansen Beverage Company v Bickfords (Australia) Pty Ltd (Australian Trade Marks Law Blog) High Court provides guidance on contributory infringement provision: Northern Territory v Collins (International Law Office) PricewaterhouseCooper… [read post]
25 Nov 2008, 9:17 am
United States v. [read post]
22 Nov 2008, 9:16 am
This, of course, is one of those ridiculous legal fictions that only a court could indulge.Orin Kerr notes the decision by 10th Circuit Judge Michael McConnell in United States v. [read post]
21 Nov 2008, 1:36 pm
(IPKat) EU favours disclosure of computer patents before standards are set (Intellectual Property Watch) Trade Marks Court of First Instance finds RAUTARUUKKI fails to satisfy acquired distinctiveness criterion: Rautaruukki Oyj v OHIM (Class 46) Court of First Instance finds original signature of famous Italian lutist Antonio Stradivari, in arte Stradivarius, of the 17th century, cannot be read by relevant consumers: T‑340/06 (Catch Us If You Can!!!) [read post]
15 Nov 2008, 6:30 pm
United States Dep't of Agriculture Department of Agriculture 08a0397p.06 Davie v. [read post]
14 Nov 2008, 4:32 am
One such so-called maxim originated with Justice Stone's "Footnote Four" in the 1938 case of United States v. [read post]
11 Nov 2008, 5:43 am
"[18] Significantly, anti-trust laws do not necessarily guarantee low prices, only the conditions that lead to them.[19] This distinction is intentional; the United States Supreme Court has recognized that while it may set the circumstances for achieving a fair price, the workings of a liberal market are better able to determine the fair price itself.[20] While anti-trust laws prohibit fixing maximum prices, the entire goal of the FPGPA is to accomplish… [read post]
10 Nov 2008, 10:39 pm
In this case, it was Hirst v UK (No2). [read post]
6 Nov 2008, 4:57 pm
It’s the answer spoken by young and old, rich and poor, Democrat and Republican, black, white, Latino, Asian, Native American, gay, straight, disabled and not disabled — Americans who sent a message to the world that we have never been a collection of Red States and Blue States: we are, and always will be, the United States of America. [read post]
4 Nov 2008, 2:56 pm
In fact the answer is that the police may not stop a person based on an anonymous tip in any state in the country because the law on this issue comes from a Supreme Court of the United States decision, as opposed to a state appellate court decision, and thus applies to all of the states. [read post]
1 Nov 2008, 3:12 am
(IPKat) United States US General 2005 civil damages awards in state courts rarely broke $1M according to report released by US Justice Department (Law360) Changes to expert witness rules draws critisism (Law360) Collaborative law and intellectual property cases (The IP ADR Blog) Democrats victory could mean a new focus on civil suits (Law360) Election could drastically affect appeals court makeup (Law360) Ethics case survey: when is attorney-client privilege… [read post]
31 Oct 2008, 11:08 am
Individual rather than the court responsible for identifying the "cause of action"Zimmer v Secretary of Department of Homeland Security, USCA, 3rd Circuit, Docket #08-1590, October 22, 2008 [not precedential]Lawrence Zimmer appealed an order by the United States District Court for the Middle District of Pennsylvania, that dismissed his employment discrimination complaint "for failing to state a claim upon which relief may be granted pursuant to 28… [read post]
25 Oct 2008, 10:01 pm
United States v. [read post]
24 Oct 2008, 11:52 pm
(Techdirt) Germany German court rules that IP addresses are not personal information (Techdirt) Google Image search thumbnails 'infringement' under German ruling (Public Knowledge) Netherlands Dutch Court imposes real-world punishment for virtual theft (Ars Technica) United Kingdom IP and media regulation will be examined in digital review (Out-Law) United States Campus Computing Project Study reveals costs of… [read post]
24 Oct 2008, 11:39 am
Smartly, Eisenhower maintained the New Deal policies and supported civil rights, including the 1954 Supreme Court decision Brown v. [read post]
23 Oct 2008, 8:28 pm
In the 1770s, the colonies of what would later be known as the United States of America sought their freedom from England. [read post]
18 Oct 2008, 7:30 pm
Obama emphasized that Wright was speaking within a particular preaching tradition of the black church and was taking a perspective anchored in the experience of the black community in America, and that his sermons were comprehensible within that context and not anti-American. [read post]
18 Oct 2008, 4:40 pm
Retailers save money by buying from the lower-cost territory.In Omega S.A. v. [read post]
