Search for: "Case v. People"
Results 4501 - 4520
of 52,001
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Sep 2024, 3:43 pm
People v. [read post]
13 Oct 2016, 12:14 pm
Feldman et al v. [read post]
21 Sep 2005, 2:55 am
[JURIST] Susette Kelo, whose case led to the June US Supreme Court ruling in Kelo v. [read post]
12 Feb 2011, 12:35 pm
Care, P.C. v Country-Wide Ins. [read post]
11 Jun 2010, 11:45 am
Anne is counsel in the case to amici curiae Not Dead Yet, ADAPT, Center for Self-Determination, National Spinal Cord Injury Association, National Council on Independent Living, American Association of People with Disabilities, and Disability Rights New Jersey. [read post]
17 Jan 2015, 9:55 am
The Supreme Court of Canada yesterday issued its opinion in Mounted Police Association of Ontario v. [read post]
23 Jul 2009, 9:31 pm
(Brunner v. [read post]
18 Mar 2013, 2:01 pm
Today is the 50th anniversary of Gideon v. [read post]
4 Aug 2013, 9:30 pm
Here's a bit more:Scholars of indigenous peoples, even those well beyond the North American continent, are alert to Johnson v. [read post]
18 Dec 2015, 10:18 am
Facts of the Case In the recent case of Liberty Mutual Insurance Company v. [read post]
19 Dec 2010, 7:25 pm
The Iowa Supreme Court stated the following as its first holding in State v. [read post]
27 Dec 2011, 3:19 pm
S. v. [read post]
12 Mar 2020, 10:21 am
Original Case Details The United States Supreme Court has recently heard arguments regarding the case of United States v. [read post]
23 Sep 2023, 7:54 am
In this year's Counterman v. [read post]
7 Jan 2014, 1:23 pm
In the present case, the development of condos at Ninth and Flower in LA -- next to the Staples Center. [read post]
23 Jun 2011, 4:41 pm
As a reminder, this case involves the March 14, 2006 breach of the Ka Loko Reservoir that caused the deaths of seven people. [read post]
18 Mar 2013, 5:13 am
People v. [read post]
22 Jan 2008, 4:36 am
U.S. v. [read post]
23 Mar 2010, 6:46 am
Case update inspired by Clancco.Cassirer v. [read post]
11 Aug 2015, 2:00 am
The majority, agreeing with Girvan LJ in the Divisional Court, held that the ECtHR in S and Marper v UK [2009] 48 EHRR 50 was not considering the position of convicted people [2], and confined the principles of the Strasbourg decision to the retention of data obtained from unconvicted persons. [read post]
