Search for: "D. S."
Results 4501 - 4520
of 236,502
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Mar 2024, 5:12 am
So, is the argument that Jesus didn't have a d*ck? [read post]
22 Mar 2024, 5:03 am
Johnson also bashed Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer (D-NY) over his recent criticism of Netanyahu’s handling of the war. [read post]
22 Mar 2024, 4:58 am
” I thought at most we might get a discussion out of it, and maybe we’d even make plans to go some point later in the year. [read post]
22 Mar 2024, 4:00 am
It consists of 12 further members, including Jennifer Bezaire, Chatelle Cseh, Darcy Romaine, Jacob Demstra, Jeremy Opolsky, John Adair, Rebecca Jones, Sunil Mathal, Suzanne Chiodo, Tamara D. [read post]
22 Mar 2024, 2:26 am
” In other emails, Bobulinski was told to use such codes to avoid mentioning Joe Biden’s name. [read post]
22 Mar 2024, 2:00 am
You’d better [expletive] hide. [read post]
21 Mar 2024, 9:30 pm
” This year’s recipient is Gerardo Con Díaz, Yale University, for Patent Law and the Materiality of Inventions in the California Oil Industry: The Story of Halliburton v. [read post]
21 Mar 2024, 8:30 pm
As to car insurers, we’ve outlined exactly what sort of guardrails we’d like to see here. [read post]
21 Mar 2024, 5:22 pm
” Subject to that paramount concern, then a reworking of the objects of s.3 of the ART Act 2007 (NSW) and, as relevant, s.6(2)(d) of the Surrogacy Act 2010 (Qld) and s.7(1)(a) of the Surrogacy Act 2019 (SA), are appropriate: “Subject to the paramount concern, the objects of this Act are: (a) to prevent the commercialisation of human reproduction, and (b) to protect the interests and human rights of the following persons: a person… [read post]
21 Mar 2024, 5:22 pm
” Subject to that paramount concern, then a reworking of the objects of s.3 of the ART Act 2007 (NSW) and, as relevant, s.6(2)(d) of the Surrogacy Act 2010 (Qld) and s.7(1)(a) of the Surrogacy Act 2019 (SA), are appropriate: “Subject to the paramount concern, the objects of this Act are: (a) to prevent the commercialisation of human reproduction, and (b) to protect the interests and human rights of the following persons: a person… [read post]
21 Mar 2024, 4:54 pm
” Do you have a criminal legal term that you’d like our lawyers to define or explain? [read post]
21 Mar 2024, 2:29 pm
I’d have to pay for a different phone with my own money (ick). [read post]
21 Mar 2024, 2:04 pm
Maybe he’d get his case assigned to Trenton! [read post]
21 Mar 2024, 1:47 pm
The language of §489.407(2)(d) requires all members to consent to a direct action and the “exceptional circumstances” rule established in the majority’s opinion is improperly “outside the text. [read post]
21 Mar 2024, 1:24 pm
"From "It’s Hard to Imagine Who’d Want to Buy Trump’s Seized Properties" (NY Magazine). [read post]
21 Mar 2024, 12:29 pm
Well, unless it's to say it's not a violation for reasons yet mysterious. [read post]
21 Mar 2024, 12:20 pm
Take “S” for example. [read post]
21 Mar 2024, 10:35 am
Supp. 90 (D. [read post]
21 Mar 2024, 10:08 am
Chief Justice D Y Chandrachud, leading the bench, emphasized the significance of the case’s constitutional aspects, particularly concerning Article 19(1)(a), safeguarding freedom of speech and expression. [read post]
21 Mar 2024, 9:24 am
The upshot of this analysis was that “federal agencies treat compensatory mitigation as including preservation of existing habitat, but usually restrict the use of preservation to exceptional circumstances” although “[d]espite this restriction, preservation is a common type of mitigation. [read post]
