Search for: "Does 1-35"
Results 4501 - 4520
of 9,559
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 Apr 2007, 5:34 am
Or why not let 99% of the country off the hook, as long as the remaining 1% picks up the tab? [read post]
26 Feb 2016, 7:22 am
EFF argues that the change has enormous implications: What does this surreptitious change from “paragraph” to “subparagraph” mean? [read post]
23 Mar 2020, 4:00 am
Superior Court, 25 Cal.App.5th 1, 9 (2018). [read post]
20 Mar 2012, 7:58 pm
Here is Table 1 from Kiddie Academy. [read post]
4 Dec 2007, 6:33 pm
The Federal Circuit stated flat out: The claims allow the choice of any surfactant in any concentration (with the exception that claim 1 of the ‘320 patent does not permit polysorbate as the surfactant if polyethylene glycol is the chosen wetting agent). [read post]
1 Mar 2012, 5:06 pm
So, if a founder’s friend invests in the startup but does not partake in actively running it, his or her contract with the startup is probably a security. [read post]
31 Aug 2020, 9:09 pm
Not only does the NHK/Fintiv rule conflict with the substantive provisions of the AIA, but the agency also lacked the authority to promulgate the rule in the way it did. [read post]
4 Feb 2011, 11:03 pm
The windows in Wimberly were 35% when the minimum transparency is 28%. [read post]
22 Feb 2021, 9:58 am
., at 1). [read post]
22 Jan 2010, 2:05 pm
EPA from regulating greenhouse gases [See WIMS 1/11/10]. [read post]
3 Feb 2007, 6:46 am
February 1, 2007)* (unpublished). [read post]
15 Sep 2011, 8:12 am
Derivation Proceedings Changes to 35 U.S.C. [read post]
11 Oct 2011, 4:00 am
While the average American does not have the wealth that Mr. [read post]
26 Sep 2019, 4:33 pm
The increased funding for a non-lethal program included in the FY 2020 report is for proven, safe, and humane fertility control tools and the onboarding of improved science as it becomes available, which does not include sterilization. [read post]
2 Sep 2010, 10:21 am
Under 35 U.S.C. [read post]
22 Mar 2012, 6:00 am
Id. at *33-35. [read post]
10 Apr 2007, 11:09 am
Code § 35-45-2-2(a)(4). [read post]
13 Jul 2011, 6:53 am
Ifrah Law’s Blog Wrap-Up, May 1-13 [read post]
18 Jul 2007, 5:01 am
Dudas (07/11/2007, non-precedential): appeal of final judgment by district court dismissing his complaint for failure to timely file (affirmed); plaintiff was entitled to appeal the USPTO's final decision under 35 U.S.C. [read post]
28 Jan 2011, 9:04 am
Kaply, 453 N.E.2d 331, 334-35 (Ind. [read post]
