Search for: "Goode v. State" Results 4501 - 4520 of 44,371
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 Apr 2011, 1:00 pm by McNabb Associates, P.C.
Robbery, defined to be the act of feloniously and forcibly taking from the person of another goods or money by violence or by putting him in fear. 11. [read post]
27 Jun 2008, 2:55 pm
With good time, and guidelines, he was facing less than 60 months, but the Parole Commission's decision to "tail" the sentence to 60 months was not unreasonable.U.S. v. [read post]
17 Nov 2011, 4:26 pm
  Because just because states might permit a defense doesn't mean that the Constitution allows such a defense in federal court. [read post]
30 May 2016, 8:04 am by James S. Friedman, LLC
  Perhaps its time for Congress and the State legislatures to review these restrictions, and determine whether they do more harm than good. [read post]
16 Nov 2012, 1:50 pm by Bexis
App. 2005) (a hospital “can bill for goods provided incidental to surgery without being in the business of selling goods. [read post]
3 Feb 2022, 8:27 am by Eugene Volokh
" No doubt this state of affairs since 1964 has diminished the public good from civic-minded citizens who understandably decline to offer their insights, energy, and wisdom to their fellow citizens, given this legal environment. [read post]
28 May 2013, 8:42 am by Kali Borkoski
Thaler, in an opinion by Justice Breyer (but announced by Justice Kennedy, because Justice Breyer was absent), the Court held by a vote of five to four  that when a state’s procedural framework, by reason of its  design and operation, makes it highly unlikely in a typical case that a defendant will have a meaningful opportunity to raise on direct appeal a claim that his trial counsel provided ineffective assistance, the good cause exception recognized in Martinez… [read post]
17 Feb 2009, 1:15 pm
Still, I thought that the timing of the orders was worth at least a tiny (good-natured) jab. [read post]
29 Apr 2015, 11:37 am
 Analysis: (1)   The court first considered whether Plaintiff stated a claim against the LLC defendants. [read post]