Search for: "In re Morales"
Results 4501 - 4520
of 11,119
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Jan 2016, 11:23 am
In re Stroming’s Will, 12 N.J. [read post]
8 Jan 2016, 11:08 am
While there is, potentially, a moral argument for the affording of rights to non-human animals, what this would do is open the floodgates for outlandish assertions of rights for animals and extend the remit of copyright beyond its (arguable) remit. [read post]
8 Jan 2016, 3:54 am
They’re not crazy. [read post]
7 Jan 2016, 1:33 pm
In re Stroming’s Will, 12 N.J. [read post]
7 Jan 2016, 1:19 pm
I’m kind of tired of In re Tam also. [read post]
5 Jan 2016, 6:30 am
The New Year provides employers and opportunity to re-examine the issue of ergonomics in the workplace. [read post]
4 Jan 2016, 9:35 pm
How do the specific features of particular markets affect the regulation that seeks to re-shape them? [read post]
4 Jan 2016, 12:57 pm
" examined BUSCAVAGE LIVING TRUSTIN RE THE JOSEPH BUSCAVAGE andHELEN A. [read post]
4 Jan 2016, 10:17 am
The first case is Glyn v Weston Feature Films Ltd which concerned public morality as the work was largely about an adulterous affair. [read post]
2 Jan 2016, 7:45 pm
., 2016 Message of His Holiness Francis for the Celebration of the World Day of Peace (Overcome Indifference and Win Peace), 1 Jan 2016 ("With this in mind, I would like to make a threefold appeal to the leaders of nations: to refrain from drawing other peoples into conflicts or wars which destroy not only their material, cultural and social legacy, but also – and in the long term – their moral and spiritual integrity; to forgive or manage in a sustainable way the… [read post]
2 Jan 2016, 4:52 am
” Is the time ripe for (re)articulation of the authority of the Good by way of abandoning the capitalist criteria for socio-economic success? [read post]
31 Dec 2015, 5:30 pm
If you're interested in the sentimentalist underpinnings of American popular sovereignty and their implications for constitutional... [read post]
31 Dec 2015, 3:30 pm
Nextwave is not, to quote, about Learning and Character Arcs and Morals and Hugs. [read post]
30 Dec 2015, 11:49 am
If we’re going to read the Two Swords passage as a mandate, it seems to mandate owning and carrying a sufficient quantity of arms for legitimate defense. [read post]
29 Dec 2015, 9:01 pm
” That truly does sound serious and seems to vindicate the title of the Washington Post story: You’re worried about Trump? [read post]
28 Dec 2015, 12:05 pm
And that judgment necessarily requires making contested moral and pragmatic decisions: What, as a moral matter, constitutes “harm”? [read post]
28 Dec 2015, 10:33 am
In re Tam, en banc Fed. [read post]
28 Dec 2015, 7:06 am
NO This is not a new argument, and it’s not without its moral justifications, but ultimately it’s a decision our legislature needs to make. [read post]
28 Dec 2015, 6:00 am
The evaluation of disparagement is not based on the government’s moral judgment, despite any distaste expressed in its briefing for cancelled or applied-for marks; a mark is disqualified based only on evidence of its perception by the affected persons. [read post]
28 Dec 2015, 2:51 am
And the French civil Supreme Court, the Cour de Cassation, held that a corporation cannot be the author of a work protected by copyright: “une personne morale ne peut avoir la qualité d’auteur. [read post]
