Search for: "In the Matter of: Brown"
Results 4501 - 4520
of 9,180
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Nov 2014, 1:42 pm
A federal court in North Carolina refused to dismiss their class action under the FCRA, which alleged that Lowe’s routinely used consumer reports, but failed to provide copies or notice of the reports before taking an adverse employment action (Brown v Lowe’s Companies, Inc). [read post]
6 Nov 2014, 8:27 am
First Amendment Claims: The court says the key question as to Austin’s First Amendment claims was whether she was speaking as an employee on a matter of employment or a citizen on a matter of public concern. [read post]
6 Nov 2014, 7:27 am
Brown, J.D. [read post]
5 Nov 2014, 2:00 pm
The proponents of wolf hunting are already saying the voters didn’t know what they were doing, and in fact, they spent much of the campaign trying to disenfranchise voters and tell them their votes don’t matter. [read post]
5 Nov 2014, 9:27 am
The attorney is glad Brown asked; he tells her that Congress has imposed many statutory protections on third party data for things like health data, wiretaps, and bank records. [read post]
5 Nov 2014, 9:07 am
Let’s say a law firm represents John Smith in one matter and Mary Brown comes to the firm asking for assistance in suing John Smith in a different matter altogether. [read post]
4 Nov 2014, 10:51 am
Deterrence and retribution matter also. [read post]
3 Nov 2014, 7:32 am
., NW, Courtroom 20, before Judges Sentelle, Williams and Brown.. [read post]
3 Nov 2014, 6:46 am
Brown, J.D. [read post]
1 Nov 2014, 4:05 pm
.); Brown v. [read post]
31 Oct 2014, 6:42 am
Sherrod Brown. [read post]
31 Oct 2014, 5:00 am
Brown v. [read post]
30 Oct 2014, 2:35 pm
Headstickers If you can’t carve out the time to watch Spookely the Square Pumpkin this Halloween season (see what I did there), you can at least watch Mike Tyson and Bobby Brown duet on ‘Monster Mash‘. [read post]
29 Oct 2014, 11:15 am
State courts aren’t strictly bound by federal appellate decisions even on matters of federal law; but they are especially not bound by them on matters of state law, since state law is what state courts (albeit state appellate courts) say it is, and federal courts app [read post]
28 Oct 2014, 9:01 pm
” But why does a default setting of “no” matter? [read post]
28 Oct 2014, 3:14 pm
Kellogg Brown & Root Servs., Inc. v. [read post]
27 Oct 2014, 9:45 am
" Who knows - maybe in a few months they'll have litigation on Brown's desk that authorizes the police to seize your phone if the police even think you took a picture. [read post]
27 Oct 2014, 2:10 am
Munchkin.Similar thoughts have been echoed in the UK, illustrated by cases such as Nova Productions Ltd v Mazooma Games Ltd, where the protected subject matter in a game was deemed to be the expression of the idea of a game, and how a game plays was seen as something which can be copied, as long as the visual and audio of that game was not.What the above case illustrates is the initial considerations of video games as a protectable subject matter under copyright. [read post]
26 Oct 2014, 7:00 pm
Timing Matters. [read post]
24 Oct 2014, 1:17 pm
Does it matter that USDA/FSIS has yet to declare Salmonella a per se adulterant? [read post]
