Search for: "John Does 1, 2, 3" Results 4501 - 4520 of 7,890
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Dec 2011, 11:25 am by Max Kennerly, Esq.
The hospital’s duties have been classified into four general areas: (1) a duty to use reasonable care in the maintenance of safe and adequate facilities and equipment; (2) a duty to select and retain only competent physicians; (3) a duty to oversee all persons who practice medicine within its walls as to patient care; and (4) a duty to formulate, adopt and enforce adequate rules and policies to ensure quality care for the patients. [read post]
9 Mar 2017, 6:02 am by Dennis Crouch
Cir. 2016) (describing the transactions at the heart of Bloomer as patent licenses and not sales of goods). [3] John Duffy and Richard Hynes, Statutory Domain and the Commercial Law of Intellectual Property, 102 Va. [read post]
16 Feb 2010, 5:43 am by Gerard Magliocca
Const., art I, § 3, cl. 1 (“The Senate of the United States shall be composed of two Senators from each State . . . [read post]
7 Nov 2011, 3:25 pm by John Gordon
  2005-2011 Transaction Summary:   Chapter 11 filing: 9 Distressed/covenant breech/ investor loss: 2 To be determined: 36 Pre-IPO status: 3 Resale to other PEs: 2 Positive trend: 3 Completed IPO: 1 Grand total: 56   Write us for the detailed spreadsheet: John A. [read post]
9 Mar 2020, 11:01 am by Eric Goldman
The letter specifically enumerates four: (1) Job creation, (2) Promoting small businesses, (3) Market efficiency, and (4) Fostering free speech for all. [read post]
2 Apr 2012, 4:00 am by Devlin Hartline
Google’s three main gripes with the bills can be boiled down thusly: (1) it’s censorship, (2) it’ll hurt innovation, and (3) it’s futile. [read post]
11 Jan 2022, 7:16 am by Eric Claeys
And proposition (3) consists of Roe's overbreadth proposition. [read post]
5 Feb 2010, 10:43 am by Jeralyn
DOJ's Paul Almanza says it does not have a position on data retention requirements and that the lack of data retention harms investigations of crimes against children. [read post]
19 Jun 2012, 10:39 am
In a landmark decision written by Chief Justice John Marshall, he wrote in his opinion of Marbury v. [read post]
24 Oct 2011, 12:11 pm
Plaintiffs' lawyers had two other things going for them: (1) insurance companies had yet to put in lead paint exclusions, and (2) most cases in suit were not yet impacted by the 1994 Reduction of Lead Paint in Housing Act. [read post]
24 Oct 2011, 12:11 pm
Plaintiffs' lawyers had two other things going for them: (1) insurance companies had yet to put in lead paint exclusions, and (2) most cases in suit were not yet impacted by the 1994 Reduction of Lead Paint in Housing Act. [read post]
26 Oct 2009, 2:03 pm by WOLFGANG DEMINO
We rejected Jimenez’s arguments that (1) the Agreement is not subject to the Federal Arbitration Act (“FAA”)[2] because post-injury agreements between a seaman and his employer are invalid under Section 5 of the Federal Employers’ Liability Act; (2) the Agreement does not meet the standards applied in Garret v. [read post]
18 Jul 2014, 11:33 am by Marty Lederman
  The government would then bear the burden of showing that denial of an exemption “(1) is in furtherance of a compelling governmental interest; and (2) is the least restrictive means of furthering that compelling governmental interest. [read post]
22 Jul 2011, 4:20 am
What does differ are deaths from such complications," said John Birkmeyer, M.D., and the study's co-author. [read post]