Search for: "Kennedy Thomas"
Results 4501 - 4520
of 4,886
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 Jan 2008, 3:21 pm
He was joined in the majority by Chief Justice John Roberts and Justices Antonin Scalia, Clarence Thomas and Samuel Alito. [read post]
15 Jan 2008, 2:29 pm
Next were Anthony Kennedy, Stephen Breyer and Samuel Alito with two each; Stevens, David Souter and Clarence Thomas with one each; and Chief Justice Roberts with none.) [read post]
15 Jan 2008, 8:24 am
The Court broke along predictable lines, with Scalia, Kennedy, Alito, Roberts and Thomas in the majority (Scalia, Thomas and Kennedy were in the majority in Central Bank, the opinion that eliminated aiding and abetting liabilty in actions under Rule 10b-5) and Ginsburg, Souter and Stevens (all three in dissent in Central Bank) in dissent in this case. [read post]
15 Jan 2008, 8:02 am
Justice Kennedy wrote the 5-3 majority opinion, in which Chief Justice Roberts and Justices Scalia, Thomas, and Alito joined. [read post]
15 Jan 2008, 7:04 am
Alito, Jr., Antonin Scalia and Clarence Thomas. [read post]
13 Jan 2008, 7:09 am
Far better to construct a completely unpersuasive theory of standing that kicked the case out of the Supreme Court than reach the decision on the merits.So, if the moderates weren't eager to take the case, does that mean that Roberts, Thomas, Scalia, and Alito were? [read post]
10 Jan 2008, 12:29 pm
Indiana's attorney, Thomas Fisher, said the law is important to reduce voter fraud. [read post]
10 Jan 2008, 12:41 am
To him, and presumably to Justices Samuel Alito and Clarence Thomas, nothing in the Constitution or the 8th Amendment's ban on "cruel and unusual punishments" precludes the imposition of any pain during an execution. [read post]
9 Jan 2008, 9:47 am
That is, Justices Roberts, Alito, Scalia, and Thomas will certainly vote to uphold a law passed by the Republican Party, claiming to be the "people of Indiana," that has the almost certain consequences of helping suppress the likely Democratic vote. [read post]
8 Jan 2008, 10:43 am
Before knowing whether the judge would enforce a burden of proof the RIAA couldn't meet -- they had no proof anyone actually downloaded songs from Thomas, the RIAA's lawyer was building a case to have Thomas found liable for simply ripping songs without permission. [read post]
8 Jan 2008, 5:19 am
The case, as often happens, could come down to Justice Anthony Kennedy, who didn't tip his hand Monday. [read post]
6 Jan 2008, 11:40 am
Today's new filings: Nancy Allf, Nevada Supreme Court Seat B Mary "Kris" Pickering, Nevada Supreme Court Seat B Thomas Christensen, Nevada Supreme Court Seat D Michael Root, Dist. [read post]
6 Jan 2008, 6:22 am
Indeed, in many of these cases, a fascinating array of different Justices have been key swingers, ranging from Justice Thomas (in Almedarez-Torres), to Justices Scalia and Breyer (in Harris), to Justice Ginsburg (in Booker). [read post]
16 Dec 2007, 6:50 pm
Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas to Speak at Chapman Dec. 17; Second Visit to Chapman by the Justice, Who Helped Open Kennedy Hall, Home of the Chapman School of Law, in 1999": Chapman University has issued this news release. [read post]
11 Dec 2007, 1:16 pm
By these measures, Justice Kennedy was the most neutral. [read post]
10 Dec 2007, 11:43 am
Chief Justice Roberts and Justices Breyer and Kennedy, the three Justices who do not bark at all but join both majority opinions, reveal general disinterest and/or general exhaustion. [read post]
7 Dec 2007, 8:49 am
Thomas Law Review has a very interesting symposium published several months ago on the occasion of the Supreme Court's having a Catholic majority. [read post]
5 Dec 2007, 8:40 am
Justice Kennedy, meanwhile, seemed to think that such an argument COULD be made before the DC Circuit, and thus the statute provides for an adequate substitute. [read post]
5 Dec 2007, 7:36 am
"And her closing paragraph:When Anthony Kennedy, who's been as silent as Clarence Thomas until this point, speaks in the last few minutes, it's to suggest that the court might be a teeny bit less deferential than usual to trial judges on "sensitive matters" such as Batson challenges. [read post]
5 Dec 2007, 3:57 am
[Bloggers' note - that sounds like another vote (#4) for the good guys]Justice Kennedy then asked whether Medtronic could change the labeling to clarify any confusion relating to the pressurization issue. [read post]
