Search for: "MATTER OF B P B P"
Results 4501 - 4520
of 5,344
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 Feb 2010, 12:33 pm
” (P.23.) [read post]
16 Feb 2010, 3:36 pm
The test which determines if a matter is collateral is whether the matter could be introduced for any purpose other than to contradict. [read post]
16 Feb 2010, 11:51 am
Order, p. 7. [read post]
15 Feb 2010, 2:00 am
The appeals court ultimately determined that whether the company’s attorneys should be disqualified is a matter for resolution upon remand to the trial court. [read post]
14 Feb 2010, 7:18 pm
The following is a summary review of articles from all over the nation concerning environmental law settlements, decisions, regulatory actions and lawsuits filed during the past week. [read post]
14 Feb 2010, 2:36 pm
As recent case law demonstrates the issue is becoming more and more compelling.27 It is predictable that instances will occur in which the ECJ again will be concerned with matters related to arbitration.28 The existing (and the future) case law may trigger specific legislative activity of the European Union in this field.29 Second, as the exclusion of arbitration from European law is not an expedient option, it seems preferable to address the interfaces with European procedural law in the… [read post]
14 Feb 2010, 1:06 pm
Any multidisciplinary physician practice or group practice (including practices including CAM practitioners in integrative care centers) should be reviewed by an attorney for self-referral and kickback concerns. [read post]
14 Feb 2010, 1:06 pm
Any multidisciplinary physician practice or group practice (including practices including CAM practitioners in integrative care centers) should be reviewed by an attorney for self-referral and kickback concerns. [read post]
13 Feb 2010, 1:32 pm
Johnson, Justice Richard B. [read post]
12 Feb 2010, 2:41 pm
Hendrix, 289 Kan. 859, 218 P.3d 40 (2009), but I write separately to note that the factual scenario in this case is very much like the hypothetical scenario depicted by Chief Justice Davis’ dissent in Hendrix. [read post]
12 Feb 2010, 11:50 am
Practically speaking, however, the source code coalition has prepared matters to point where it requires little effort from attorneys to take advantage of this issue. [read post]
12 Feb 2010, 11:47 am
P. 324(b)(2). [read post]
11 Feb 2010, 11:58 am
P. 12(b)(3)(C). [read post]
11 Feb 2010, 7:12 am
No real auditing.6 Tips not from an insider.6, 10, 22, 42, 43 Madoff being well connected.6 Not resolving open questions.7 Unprepared to take Madoff’s testimony.9 A&B’s nonrecordkeeping and reasons.9 Fake DTC records.9, 10 Ira Sorkin and A&B.9, 11 Only brief examination of Madoff in 1992.10 Price Waterhouse can’t audit A&B. 11 Judge Sprizzo11 3 to 7 billion in 2000.12 Not allowing performance audits.12 Ward apparently lied.12… [read post]
11 Feb 2010, 4:58 am
For that reason LM v Medway Council (2007) EWCA Civ 9, (2007) 1 FLR 1698, R v B CC Ex p P (1991) 1 WLR 221 CA (Civ Div), P (A Minor) (Witness Summons), Re (1997) 2 FLR 447 CA (Civ Div) and W (Children) (Care Order: Sexual Abuse), Re (2009) EWCA Civ 644, (2009) 2 Cr App R 23 should be overruled. [read post]
11 Feb 2010, 2:09 am
“[P]aragraph 4(b) merely deems these circumstances ‘evidence’ of the registration and use in bad faith … thereby making it clear that the expression in paragraph 4(b) ‘registration and use of a domain name in bad faith’ is mere shorthand for the expression in paragraph 4(a)(iii) ‘the disputed domain name has been registered and is being used in bad faith’,” Validas. [read post]
10 Feb 2010, 7:12 am
It’s no less clear why we’ll wind up marching down that path, no matter what the current FCC leadership intends. [read post]
9 Feb 2010, 8:22 am
F, Title VI, sec. 602(b)(4) (reproduced at 8 U.S.C. 1101 note). [read post]
9 Feb 2010, 2:58 am
Animation Celection, Inc., 170 Or.App. 702, 13 P.3d 1044, 1047 (2000) (holding causal element of misrepresentation claim requires reliance by the consumer); cf. [read post]
8 Feb 2010, 11:07 am
With some exceptions, it does not matter to the immigration department that an application for Canadian immigration or Canadian citizenship is represented by someone who is competent. [read post]