Search for: "Mays v. State"
Results 4501 - 4520
of 119,055
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 Jul 2014, 5:49 am
Riley v. [read post]
1 Jul 2019, 9:58 am
In Mitchell v. [read post]
14 Jul 2017, 2:31 pm
On May 30, 2017, the Supreme Court decided Impression Products, Inc. v. [read post]
16 Jun 2010, 12:48 pm
Folks may well debate the merits of any or all of these decisions, but the basic gist was helpfully summarized in 1973 by Justice Brennan, when he wrote for the Court in Hensley v. [read post]
21 Mar 2012, 5:10 am
Although disparate impact may be relevant evidence of discrimination such evidence is insufficient to prove a constitutional violation even where the Fourteenth Amendment subjects state action to strict scrutiny, the plurality explained, citing Board of Trustees of Univ of Ala v Garrett. [read post]
13 Feb 2013, 5:00 am
State Farm Mutual Automobile Ins. [read post]
2 May 2023, 5:20 pm
In other results, the following individuals were elected to the State Bar of Texas Board of Directors: Christopher V. [read post]
14 Jun 2011, 9:17 am
Hochstein et al. v. [read post]
17 Mar 2017, 3:28 pm
United States (2005) 546 U.S. 12, 17–18; see also Bowles v. [read post]
12 Mar 2009, 2:18 pm
In Homa v. [read post]
10 Aug 2021, 9:03 am
In Dr Jaishri Laxmanrao Patil v. [read post]
2 Aug 2011, 3:23 am
Citing Braxton v Mendelson, 233 NY 122, the court said that a number of elements may be helpful in attempting to decide the question. [read post]
19 May 2009, 2:10 pm
So nutty, in fact, that your wife rats out out, and Alaska state troopers come to your house to involuntarily commit you to a psychiatric institution.But this is Alaska, for Christ's sake. [read post]
17 Dec 2018, 2:29 am
LV alleged that in this assessment the Board of Appeal ‘openly’ infringed the principle that distinctive character may arise from use as part of a registered mark or in conjunction with a registered mark, if, as a consequence of that use, that sign may serve to identify, in the minds of the relevant persons, the goods to which it relates as originating from a particular undertaking. [read post]
17 Dec 2010, 12:32 am
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circle has decided on the interesting and important case of MDY v Blizzard. [read post]
7 Oct 2021, 6:34 am
In Jackler [v. [read post]
24 Feb 2011, 7:02 am
The 2008 Superior Court of Quebec decision in Teitelbaum v. 9093-8119 Quebec Inc. and the 1980 Ontario Supreme Court decision in Royal Bank of Canada v. [read post]
30 Aug 2023, 5:10 pm
States all have their own unique procedural rules that may make it difficult for plaintiffs to get a ruling. [read post]
23 Apr 2013, 2:54 pm
In the case of Powers v. [read post]
16 Mar 2016, 10:37 am
This exception ensured that the rationale of the Delaware Supreme Court, in its May 2014 decision ATP Tour v. [read post]
