Search for: "PFIZER"
Results 4501 - 4520
of 4,566
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 Dec 2006, 2:48 pm
According to a recent story by the Associated Press, federal advisers recommended that Pfizer be allowed to market the painkiller Celebrex as a treatment for children with a severe form of arthritis, even though they were split on whether it... [read post]
30 Nov 2006, 9:45 pm
Andrx Celebrex--Pfizer v. [read post]
29 Nov 2006, 10:12 pm
If you are Pfizer and you are looking at patenting something as valuable as Viagra, the choice is simple and clearcut. [read post]
29 Nov 2006, 6:00 am
(See Pfizer Inc. v. [read post]
29 Nov 2006, 5:26 am
The trial on Pfizer's Norvasc began on Nov. 28 in the Western District in Pennsylvania (WD Pa) under Judge Terrence McVerry and is expected to last about a week. [read post]
27 Nov 2006, 6:25 am
In any event, Pfizer is a very practical company. [read post]
24 Nov 2006, 6:00 am
Here's a medley of little bits and pieces to keep you happy over the weekend as you gear yourselves up for the last week of November ...The Ranbaxy/Pfizer Lipitor scoreboard. [read post]
21 Nov 2006, 6:36 am
Pfizer sued Guangzhou Welman for alleged copyright infringement of Viagra reports Forbes.I wonder why Pfizer's allegations focused on copyright infringement instead of patent infringement, or both. [read post]
15 Nov 2006, 6:00 am
Two weeks ago, when I reported on the Supreme Court's grant of review in In re Tobacco II and Pfizer, I pointed out that the two Court of Appeal opinions were "no longer citable as precedent. [read post]
13 Nov 2006, 12:48 pm
Though the cases have nothing to do with wage and hour matters, In re Tobacco Cases II and Pfizer, Inc. v. [read post]
13 Nov 2006, 6:00 am
This case came down shortly before all the excitement surrounding In re Tobacco and Pfizer. [read post]
7 Nov 2006, 7:26 pm
EST, featuring Barbara Valentine, senior director, SOX, for Pfizer Inc. [read post]
7 Nov 2006, 6:00 am
The list includes In re Tobacco and Pfizer, of course. [read post]
6 Nov 2006, 7:12 am
From the New York Times:Democrats, who have long charged that the drug industry is profiteering at taxpayers' expense, say they want to introduce legislation to revoke the law that bars Medicare from negotiating prices directly with drug makers like Pfizer... [read post]
3 Nov 2006, 7:57 am
One of the most significant shifts has been made by Pfizer, which until September was giving 67 per cent of its donations to the Republicans, but in October Democrats were in receipt of 59 per cent. [read post]
3 Nov 2006, 6:00 am
As you note, Pfizer was extended to Nov. 9. [read post]
2 Nov 2006, 3:26 pm
As first reported by fellow blogger, Kimberly Kralowec, on her webblog, The UCL Practitioner, the California Supreme Court has granted review of the Court of Appeal’s decision in In Re Tobacco II Cases and issued a grant and hold order for Pfizer. [read post]
2 Nov 2006, 9:51 am
Also, for everyone's convenience here are quick links to the Court of Appeal opinions in the two cases: In re Tobacco II Cases, 142 Cal.App.4th 891 (2006) (review granted) Pfizer, Inc. v. [read post]
2 Nov 2006, 6:01 am
Pfizer preceded Mervyn's by almost two weeks. [read post]
1 Nov 2006, 3:51 pm
S147345, and issued a "grant and hold" order in Pfizer v. [read post]
