Search for: "Plaintiff(s)" Results 4501 - 4520 of 178,510
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 May 2007, 7:31 am
Litigation, 109 F.R.D. 602, 609 (D.Del.1986) (granting plaintiff's voluntary dismissal on the condition that he not file a duplicative class action in any court); Goldlawr, Inc. v. [read post]
10 Jul 2019, 5:30 am by Daniel E. Cummins
Nealon of the Lackawanna County Court of Common Pleas addressed issues of alleged adjacent landowner liability for injuries that occurred on a neighbor's property.According to the Opinion, the Plaintiff allegedly snagged her pants on a neighbor's chain link fence and fell forward onto the surface of the premises owned by that neighbor but injured her arm on the protruding tip of a cemetery grave marker that was embedded in the ground on the… [read post]
9 Jul 2019, 4:42 am by Daniel E. Cummins
  The plaintiff alleged that GEICO had breached the insurance contract by previously applying the Household Exclusion and denying the plaintiff's claims back on September 19, 2014.Judge Gerald J. [read post]
17 May 2021, 10:27 am by Arthur F. Coon
The underlying CEQA litigation here involved Clews Horse Ranch’s challenge to the City of San Diego’s MND and project approvals for a private secondary school adjacent to its commercial horse ranch. [read post]
13 Jul 2010, 10:32 pm by Michael Atkins
Instead, it is the plaintiffs burden to prove the defendant’s use is not nominative fair use. [read post]
10 Nov 2021, 6:12 am by Second Circuit Civil Rights Blog
But plaintiff's letters to the court suggest he had to leave work early one day to satisfy a religious obligation (he is Hindu) and that management knew about his religion and told him not to read religious texts at work. [read post]
18 May 2018, 12:54 pm by Dean Freeman
Ultimately, plaintiffs claim went to trial and jurors decided the case in his favor, awarding him damages of nearly $214,000. [read post]
30 May 2022, 5:00 am
.), the court granted the Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment in a winter slip and fall case. [read post]
23 Sep 2013, 7:14 am by Docket Navigator
With these concessions, the Court will rule that [plaintiff's counsel] can file an appearance in this case or any other federal cases without running the risk of violating the State of Nebraska Attorney General’s cease and desist order. [read post]
29 Apr 2021, 12:46 pm by Legal Profession Prof
A law firm may not recover its legal fees from its client's insurer according to a decision of the New York Appellate Division for the First Judicial Department Plaintiff law firm lacks standing to recover its legal fees under the... [read post]
30 Mar 2022, 2:11 pm by Robertson Noreus
Key Insight: On plaintiffs motion to compel, the magistrate judge ruled that defendant Takeda was to produce “all responsive ESI to Plaintiffs, including earlier-in-time emails. [read post]
3 Dec 2015, 12:55 pm by John C. Manoog III
The plaintiff filed a motion for a protective order pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26(c), seeking to prohibit the defendant’s discovery of the plaintiffs privileged mental health records. [read post]
15 Aug 2008, 5:50 pm
  Now all of the editors have written a brief in the Levine case on the side of the plaintiff. [read post]
19 Sep 2024, 4:06 am by Jeremy Telman
While the plaintiffs' guardians sent in the plaintiffs' saliva samples to Ancestry.com, plaintiffs did not read Ancestry.com's terms, nor were they required... [read post]