Search for: "Public Employment Law Press"
Results 4501 - 4520
of 7,010
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Jul 2014, 1:02 pm
A Public Interest Group with Everything? [read post]
12 Jul 2014, 1:02 pm
The firm practices in the areas of environmental law, litigation, legislative affairs, IP, employment practices and international tax and transactions. [read post]
10 Jul 2014, 8:37 am
“This new law takes an important step toward bringing relief to patients living with extraordinary pain and illness,” Governor Cuomo said in a press release. [read post]
9 Jul 2014, 1:15 pm
” “...In addition, we want to send a message to anyone who continues to willfully and aggressively evade our tax laws by hiding money overseas that they will pay a higher price for that noncompliance. [read post]
8 Jul 2014, 11:51 am
Limited, non-exclusive right to republished granted to Solutions Law Press, Inc. [read post]
8 Jul 2014, 9:23 am
The immunity of a disseminator ends, however, when the dissemination is no longer ‘innocent’, i.e. when the person has knowledge that what is being made available to the public is defamatory. [read post]
8 Jul 2014, 6:51 am
The law firm also noted that the EEOC had advised the federal agency in July 2009, that its criminal background screening process could violate federal law. [read post]
8 Jul 2014, 5:04 am
Employer's premiums are reasonable.The other system is dysfunctional. [read post]
7 Jul 2014, 5:57 pm
The IC Regs are an exception to the general principle that it is unlawful for a person, without lawful authority, intentionally to intercept a communication in the course of its transmission by way of a public or private telecommunications system. [read post]
7 Jul 2014, 8:34 am
Subsequently on June 4, 2009, Parkview employees, with notice that the physician was not at home, left 71 cardboard boxes of these medical records unattended and accessible to unauthorized persons on the driveway of the physician’s home, within 20 feet of the public road and a short distance away from a heavily trafficked public shopping venue. [read post]
7 Jul 2014, 8:18 am
Always rarely the case, the changes in the marketplace and the law make it even more likely that sponsoring employers and their leaders of even plans that carefully reviewed and negotiated these responsibilities in their past contracts need to carefully look at these plan and contractual terms carefully. [read post]
6 Jul 2014, 9:00 pm
How do reporters decide what the public has a right to know? [read post]
6 Jul 2014, 1:08 pm
Lee, that "[w]hen followers of a particular sect enter into commercial activity as a matter of choice, the limits they accept on their own conduct as a matter of conscience and faith are not to be superimposed on the statutory schemes which are binding on others in that activity,” at least where “[g]ranting an exemption . . . to an employer operates to impose the employer’s religious faith on the employees. [read post]
6 Jul 2014, 1:00 am
The "book examines how women who embraced the free-labor promise took up the tools of public and political life to assert the respectability of paid employment and to confront the demon of prostitution. [read post]
4 Jul 2014, 5:27 am
C flatly rejected Mismas's suggestion, but he continued to press the issue. [read post]
3 Jul 2014, 7:41 pm
It was to be centered on states in the area of public law, states were to coordinate their approaches to domestic regulation through the instrumentalities of multilateral engagement through human rights centered international organizations. [read post]
3 Jul 2014, 7:28 am
The February 3rd entry explains the strategy of an employer unilaterally imposing new contract terms, and law behind it]. [read post]
2 Jul 2014, 12:07 pm
Arriving at the Supreme Court, each party pressed for an aggressive change in labor law. [read post]
2 Jul 2014, 8:48 am
Finally, the public is adversely affected by the impact of debt on law students and graduates. [read post]
1 Jul 2014, 11:00 am
The RFRA requires government, in enacting a law or policy of general application, to select the alternative that imposes the least burden upon religious freedom.Obamacare itself did not require employers to offer insurance coverage for contraceptive measures. [read post]
