Search for: "SUITS v. STATE"
Results 4501 - 4520
of 32,557
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Sep 2019, 12:23 pm
Facts: This case (Bailon v. [read post]
26 Feb 2021, 9:14 am
Case citation: The Ohio State University v. [read post]
28 Mar 2023, 5:00 am
In the case of Galette v. [read post]
3 Apr 2013, 8:09 am
Although I will say that the suit itself does seem a bit at odds with the public positions taken by "Robert Catalanello" on the Madison Patch web site that "tort reform is the only way to prevent ridiculous strike suits" and that he wants to "push ambulance chasing lawyers off the ladder" (!). [read post]
29 Mar 2013, 8:04 am
United States, 450 U.S. 544 (1981). [read post]
2 Mar 2011, 2:23 pm
In State of Oregon v. [read post]
24 Jul 2007, 8:47 am
Sixteen are civil suits, six are criminal cases, and four are Habeus appeals. [read post]
11 Mar 2010, 8:55 pm
LifeLock Agrees to Settle FTC, State Suits Challenging Identity Theft Protection ClaimsThis posting was written by Jeffrey May, Editor of CCH Trade Regulation Reporter.Identity theft service LifeLock, Inc. has agreed to pay $12 million and to refrain from making deceptive claims to settle FTC and state charges that it misrepresented its services. [read post]
30 Jan 2007, 3:28 am
United States, 581 F.2d 390, 397 (4th Cir. 1978). [read post]
28 Apr 2017, 4:53 am
The recent decision of Trusa v. [read post]
12 Jan 2011, 3:57 pm
[Post by Venkat Balasubramani] Knight v. [read post]
29 Sep 2023, 10:04 am
” Butler v. [read post]
11 Apr 2025, 5:25 am
”68 For support, Judge Bumatay cited to Duro v. [read post]
6 Jun 2008, 8:00 am
The case is Doe v. [read post]
4 Jan 2024, 4:19 am
The Supreme Court, in Arizona v. [read post]
6 Mar 2016, 9:00 am
In 2014, we covered the United States Supreme Court’s decision in CTS Corp. v. [read post]
8 May 2014, 1:28 pm
Octane succeeded on a summary judgment motion in district court to dismiss the suit. [read post]
4 Jan 2013, 8:03 am
Kirch v. [read post]
13 Aug 2012, 5:54 pm
Shatto v. [read post]
31 Jul 2017, 3:37 pm
On July 7, 2017, the California Supreme Court filed its 69-page opinion, written by Chief Justice Cantil-Sakauye and joined by five other justices, in Friends of the Eel River v. [read post]
