Search for: "Sales v. State"
Results 4501 - 4520
of 21,152
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 Mar 2020, 1:03 pm
Supreme Court’s South Dakota v. [read post]
16 Apr 2007, 1:17 pm
The case is Quanta Computer, Inc. v. [read post]
29 Oct 2015, 2:00 am
The Seller relied on The Golden Victory (Golden Strait Corporation v. [read post]
15 Apr 2024, 9:49 am
United States, taxpayers have argued that the Sixteenth Amendment only authorizes taxation of realized income—this is, that gain from appreciated property can only be taxed as “income” when there has been a sale or conversion of that property. [read post]
15 Apr 2024, 9:49 am
United States, taxpayers have argued that the Sixteenth Amendment only authorizes taxation of realized income—this is, that gain from appreciated property can only be taxed as “income” when there has been a sale or conversion of that property. [read post]
16 Apr 2013, 8:25 am
The plaintiff, an African American employed by the defendant in sales/customer service, brought class and individual actions in state court. [read post]
16 May 2022, 12:50 pm
Inst., Inc. v. [read post]
18 Jun 2011, 7:08 am
North County Times is reporting the indefinite delay of United States v. [read post]
1 Jun 2011, 6:48 am
Co. v. [read post]
13 Feb 2019, 1:33 pm
California has long been known as a state that bans post-employment non-compete and customer non-solicitation agreements for its employees, absent very limited exceptions related to the sale of a business and trade secret protection. [read post]
6 Nov 2014, 7:27 am
Contract breach and state labor law claims. [read post]
27 Jul 2019, 5:26 pm
In East of Eden Cannabis Co. v. [read post]
25 Sep 2008, 5:37 pm
We the People Nevada v. [read post]
15 May 2024, 7:51 am
Lexmark contended that foreign sales should not exhaust U.S. patent rights unless expressly stated. [read post]
1 Jun 2010, 3:55 pm
Petitioner is an owner of strawberry farm in California and entered into a contract with the Respondent, who is a distributor, for the sale of flats of strawberries. [read post]
21 Oct 2016, 12:15 am
In this case, the act complained of was an offer for sale in England, on the principles laid down in L’Oreal v eBay, i.e. the defendant’s website was not merely accessible from the UK but was in fact targeted at (among others) English customers.The allegedly infringing product on Heritage Audio's sitePassing-offFor passing-off, the judge noted that the CJEU had applied the Brussels I rules not only to trade mark and copyright infringement claims but also to claims… [read post]
15 Jun 2015, 5:17 pm
She also adverted to Alice Corporation v CLS [noted on the IPKat here], to which the other speakers would later refer. [read post]
14 Jan 2013, 3:21 am
., Inc. v. [read post]
15 Jul 2009, 1:41 pm
United States v. [read post]
28 Jun 2017, 9:37 pm
In Roswell Trailers, Inc. v. [read post]
