Search for: "State Bank v. United States" Results 4501 - 4520 of 7,410
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 Jan 2016, 1:15 pm by Benjamin Wittes, Zoe Bedell
  Section 2333 reads, in relevant part, as follows: Any national of the United States injured in his or her person, property, or business by reason of an act of international terrorism, or his or her estate, survivors, or heirs, may sue therefor in any appropriate district court of the United States and shall recover threefold the damages he or she sustains and the cost of the suit, including attorney’s fees. [read post]
3 Mar 2017, 9:43 am by Jason Kaufman
Energy United States, LLC, that an employee who only reports a suspected violation internally is not a protected whistleblower for the purposes of Dodd-Frank’s anti-relation provision. [read post]
29 Mar 2017, 7:49 am by Kate Howard
Arab Bank, PLC 16-499 Issue: Whether the Alien Tort Statute, 28 U.S.C. [read post]
4 Sep 2009, 1:52 am
  CP Ships’ headquarters is located in the United Kingdom, but CP Ships’ former CEO allegedly “micromanaged” the transition in accounting systems while based in the United States and made certain of the alleged misstatements about CP Ships’ financial condition while in the United States. [read post]
2 Jul 2018, 11:38 am by Erwin Chemerinsky
One important Kennedy opinion pointing in the other direction was United States v. [read post]
9 May 2023, 1:58 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
Z o.o. and others v Jakubowski and others, heard 28th February 2023 Thaler v Comptroller-General of Patents, Designs and Trade Marks, heard 2nd March 2023 The Manchester Ship Canal Company Ltd v United Utilites Water Ltd No 2, heard 6th March 2023 London Borough of Merton Council v Nuffield Health Ltd, heard 7th March 2023 R (on the application of Palmer) v Northern Derbyshire Magistrates Court and another, heard… [read post]
9 May 2014, 3:50 am by Broc Romanek
The SUM prospectus’ third paragraph consists of the following sentence: “The dearness of labour and the want of Capital are the two great objections to the success of manufactures in the United States. [read post]
24 Oct 2019, 7:00 am by Andrew Hamm
United States 19-361Disclosure: Goldstein & Russell, P.C., whose attorneys contribute to this blog in various capacities, is counsel on a cert-stage amicus brief in support of the petitioners in this case. [read post]
26 Jul 2022, 6:43 am by Florian Mueller
Alarmed by those overtures, the German federal government became minority shareholder, and the European Commission--together with the European Investment Bank--entered into a financing agreement with CureVac. [read post]
10 Jun 2021, 5:01 am by Thalia Kruger
Citibank, 201 F.3d 134, 138 (2d Cir. 2000), and an Iranian judgment against the sister of the former Shah, Bank Melli Iran v. [read post]
18 Sep 2019, 9:06 am by Jason Rantanen
  On August 15, 2019, Time Warner filed a petition with the United States Supreme Court seeking to vacate a $139.8 million damages verdict. [read post]
5 Jul 2018, 12:44 pm by Todd N. Tucker
United States—were 8-1 and 9-0 rulings against the so-called First New Deal. [read post]
9 Jan 2019, 5:37 am by Quinta Jurecic
Much of the commentary around on Trump’s proposed national emergency has focused on the framework set out in Justice Robert Jackson’s deservedly famous concurrence in Youngstown Sheet & Tube Co. v. [read post]
18 Dec 2014, 7:08 am by John Elwood
United States, 14-282, is yet another gift from the St. [read post]