Search for: "State v. Bias"
Results 4501 - 4520
of 5,337
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Dec 2009, 3:00 am
(IP Dragon) Trademark registration in China (China Law Blog) Another ridiculous IPR protection awareness event (China Hearsay) Colombia Colombia’s Senate approves accession to Madrid Protocol in second reading (Managing IP) Europe EU member states sign agreement in principle on establishing single EU patent (Managing IP) (IAM) (Blog@IPJUR.com) (IPKat) Lisbon treaty updates EU; new commissioners named (IP Watch) Hague Agreement: you win some, you lose some –… [read post]
4 Dec 2009, 9:04 pm
In The Householder Group v. [read post]
4 Dec 2009, 11:15 am
Skilling is also challenging his conviction on the grounds of jury bias. [read post]
4 Dec 2009, 5:12 am
 The rules also specifically state that a judge is not disqualified based solely on campaign speech protected by Republican Part of Minn v White, 536 US 765 (2002), and, in the most controversial amendment, provide for review by the entire Supreme Court if a single justice denies a motion for disqualification. [read post]
4 Dec 2009, 3:10 am
Zieler and State Farm, No. [read post]
4 Dec 2009, 3:00 am
Lorilland Tobacco Co. v. [read post]
3 Dec 2009, 8:04 pm
Perfect Web v. [read post]
1 Dec 2009, 7:50 am
The United States Supreme Court recently asked the solicitor general for the government's position on the case of Staub v. [read post]
1 Dec 2009, 6:09 am
A recent New York Times editorial post stated that Congress is considering overturning a court ruling about age discrimination (Gross v. [read post]
26 Nov 2009, 8:30 am
Sheriff v. [read post]
19 Nov 2009, 7:49 am
PREJUDICIAL VALUESalm v. [read post]
18 Nov 2009, 5:47 pm
” The court stated that ‘evident partiality’ under the FAA means ‘bias’ that is ‘clearly evident in the decisionmakers’ and concluded that Faulkner failed to meet its burden. [read post]
18 Nov 2009, 4:49 pm
A problem with delusions is confirmation bias writ large. [read post]
17 Nov 2009, 2:01 am
iStock_000003589389Medium.jpg While noting general agreement that FRE 606(b) precludes inquiry into the validity of a verdict based on a juror’s testimony about racial or ethnic comments made “during the course of deliberations,†First Circuit finds the rule “cannot be applied so inflexibly as to bar juror testimony in those rare and grave cases where claims of racial or ethnic bias during jury deliberations implicate a… [read post]
17 Nov 2009, 12:09 am
" For a completely different take on basically the same issue, see the 10th Circuit Court of Appeals decision in United States v. [read post]
15 Nov 2009, 6:18 pm
” United States v. [read post]
14 Nov 2009, 8:53 pm
The Court stated, "Where the witness the accused seeks to cross-examine is the 'star' government witness, providing an essential link in the prosecution's case, the importance of full cross-examination to disclose possible bias is necessarily increased. [read post]
14 Nov 2009, 5:15 pm
But see this week’s opinion in U.S. v. [read post]
13 Nov 2009, 3:19 pm
Summary of Decision issued November 12, 2009 Summaries are prepared by Law Librarians and are not official statements of the Wyoming Supreme Court Case Name: Exxon Mobil Corp. v. [read post]
13 Nov 2009, 3:08 pm
" and This bias should not be allowed to interfere with the State's due process rights in a manner that infects "the integrity of the trial process. [read post]
