Search for: "State v. E. E. B." Results 4501 - 4520 of 10,083
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 Dec 2015, 10:33 am by John Elwood
AT&T moved to dismiss, arguing that the relator failed to comply with Rule 9(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure by not stating specific facts regarding at least one allegedly false or fraudulent claim submitted to the government. [read post]
15 Dec 2015, 6:01 am by Barry Sookman
The wording of the condition in the Annex (Annex E to Schedule J) of the TPP practically tracks the wording of Subsection 31.1(5). [read post]
13 Dec 2015, 5:42 pm by Angelo A. Paparelli
Most other States have experienced unacceptably long processing and adjudication delays. [read post]
8 Dec 2015, 10:03 am by Nicholas Gebelt
§ 6015(b)(1)(E) has a chronological requirement as well:  You must request innocent spouse relief no later than two years after the date the IRS first attempted to collect the tax from you. [read post]
7 Dec 2015, 3:33 am by Peter Mahler
” That’s how the Maryland Court of Appeals — that state’s highest court — in Bontempo v Lares, 444 Md. 344 [2015], recently referred to the remedy of judicial dissolution made available by statute in most states, including New York, to oppressed minority shareholders of closely held corporations. [read post]
3 Dec 2015, 12:25 pm by John Elwood
He added, “[w]e should grant certiorari to discourage this appetite—or maybe just serve green beans. [read post]