Search for: "State v. Field"
Results 4501 - 4520
of 12,939
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 Mar 2011, 6:00 am
In Brady v. [read post]
5 Nov 2008, 11:34 pm
On the one hand, the CAFC noted the CAFC's decision in State Street Bank & Trust Co. v. [read post]
25 Jun 2015, 3:34 pm
Judge Sarah Vance’s opinion in Burst v. [read post]
3 Nov 2023, 7:12 am
Varese, V. [read post]
6 Jun 2011, 11:52 am
The state’s governor, Pat Quinn, pursued the second appeal (Quinn v. [read post]
16 Mar 2014, 7:10 pm
The Hospital, party to a contract with the State of Florida to provide 24 hour emergency medical care in the field of gastroenterology, contacted six physicians under its employ to provide care. [read post]
29 Mar 2009, 5:48 am
On Tuesday, ACCA will hear oral arugment in United States v. [read post]
7 Dec 2020, 10:42 am
The Florida Legislature meets yearly in Tallahassee, the State’s Capitol, to craft new legislation during a two month session. [read post]
8 Nov 2018, 8:25 am
V. [read post]
5 Apr 2007, 1:25 pm
In People v. [read post]
3 Dec 2022, 12:44 am
This is its newsletter dealing with recent developments in the field. [read post]
8 Oct 2021, 2:31 pm
Zana v. [read post]
23 Jul 2024, 12:51 am
(See Nunes v State of California, DMV (2023) 88 Cal. [read post]
30 Oct 2017, 5:05 am
” The court also stated that the claims’ improvement on the operation of existing fare collection systems, and their limitation to the field of mass transit, did not save them from being considered an abstract idea. [read post]
3 Jan 2014, 5:52 am
., Lartigue v. [read post]
21 Feb 2014, 7:48 am
In Mayo v. [read post]
13 May 2014, 4:59 pm
United States v. [read post]
11 Sep 2008, 5:15 am
The ambiguous and often tragic world of alleged and actual sex offenders - running the gamut from harmless experimentation and role-playing to sinister preying on defenseless victims - is brought into sharp relief in the Second Circuit's decision in United States v. [read post]
19 Feb 2010, 9:50 am
For those who are interested, the seminal case is Little v. [read post]
16 May 2012, 4:25 am
The NLRB lacked a quorum of board members when it published its rule amending its representation election procedures on December 16, 2011, and the challenged rule is therefore invalid, the District of Columbia federal district court held, in a perhaps tepid — and temporary — victory for opponents of what has been dubbed the board’s “quickie” or “ambush” election rule (Chamber of Commerce of the United States v NLRB, May 14, 2012, Boasberg,… [read post]
