Search for: "State v. Levell " Results 4501 - 4520 of 29,623
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 Sep 2021, 10:00 am
  A thinly staffed, low level organ, with a small budget, for example, would hardly be in a position to take on the Foreign Ministry or even the Commerce Ministry, much less the large transnational enterprises whose local agents or factors may be generating human rights wrongs. [read post]
22 Sep 2021, 9:08 pm by Michael Lomtevas
High fish densities and poor water circulation can also cause eutrophication—nutrient concentrations reaching toxic levels in water. [read post]
21 Sep 2021, 11:52 am by Eric Goldman
The law governs users who meet any of the following: resides in the state, does business in the state, or “shares or receives content on a social media platform in this state. [read post]
21 Sep 2021, 6:04 am by Florian Mueller
Two days later, the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit will finally hold its postponed (due to Hurricane Ida) hearing in Continental v. [read post]
20 Sep 2021, 10:01 am by Bonnie Snyder
His first principle — "no compelled speech, thought, or belief" — reminds us of the important precedent set by West Virginia State Board of Education v. [read post]
19 Sep 2021, 9:03 pm by Joshua Sellers
This background helps explain the widespread condemnation that the Supreme Court’s recent decision in Brnovich v. [read post]
17 Sep 2021, 10:58 am by Eric Goldman
Emoji were also in the limelight in a case before the State Labor Court of Baden-Württemberg. [read post]
17 Sep 2021, 7:30 am by Public Employment Law Press
Explaining that it is "well-settled [s]tate policy that appointments and promotions within the civil service system must be merit-based and, when 'practicable,' determined by competitive examination," as mandated by Article V §6 of the State Constitution, opined that "[t]he constitutional dictate does not create an absolute bar to civil service appointments and promotions without competitive examinations. [read post]
17 Sep 2021, 7:30 am by Public Employment Law Press
Explaining that it is "well-settled [s]tate policy that appointments and promotions within the civil service system must be merit-based and, when 'practicable,' determined by competitive examination," as mandated by Article V §6 of the State Constitution, opined that "[t]he constitutional dictate does not create an absolute bar to civil service appointments and promotions without competitive examinations. [read post]