Search for: "State v. Marks"
Results 4501 - 4520
of 19,483
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 Jan 2012, 1:24 pm
The government moved to dismiss the case, and Judge Richard Mark Gergel granted the motion. [read post]
9 Dec 2009, 8:41 am
FragranceNet.com, Inc. v. [read post]
27 Jun 2018, 1:45 pm
'” On June 26, 2013, a divided Court in United States v. [read post]
14 Apr 2017, 2:26 am
USA: Fox Television Stations, Inc. v. [read post]
24 Feb 2007, 11:55 am
It argued that its registered mark should be considered as a whole, stating: SPAM and SPAM ARREST are not seen as essentially the same. [read post]
9 Aug 2023, 3:00 am
July 28, 2023). 2Rod & Reel v. [read post]
15 Mar 2014, 8:31 am
United States v. [read post]
14 Sep 2017, 6:49 am
Finally, the question remains whether use of a mark by the public will suffice to support a producer’s rights in that mark. [read post]
16 Dec 2013, 1:24 pm
V. [read post]
23 Jul 2015, 6:32 am
United States, 293 F. 1013 (D.C. [read post]
16 Apr 2010, 10:10 am
No court will go along with this today as stated. [read post]
7 Mar 2024, 2:16 am
By Mark A. [read post]
30 Nov 2009, 9:00 am
United States and Weyhrauch v. [read post]
15 Dec 2010, 10:35 am
Two weeks ago, the United States Supreme Court decided to hear another patent case[1] – marking only the ninth time during the Chief Justice Roberts era that Court has decided to do so. [read post]
25 Jan 2016, 2:33 pm
Among them was a holding that Miller v. [read post]
20 Apr 2018, 4:22 am
” For The Washington Post, Mark Berman reports that “Moody unsuccessfully appealed to the U.S. [read post]
12 Aug 2016, 3:49 am
At least the Federal Court of Justice (Bundesgerichtshof) in Olympia-Rabatt stated that the relevant provisions of the German Olympia Protection Act 2004 must be interpreted restrictively. [read post]
7 Aug 2008, 12:47 pm
United States v. [read post]
18 Feb 2008, 6:22 am
United States v. [read post]
