Search for: "State v. Register"
Results 4501 - 4520
of 13,697
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Nov 2021, 9:56 pm
The other conditions - namely, that the rights to the sign were acquired prior to the date of application for registration of the EU trade mark, and that the sign confers upon its proprietor the right to prohibit the use of a subsequent mark - were to be considered in light of the criteria set out by the law of the Member State governing that sign, so UK law.The relevant UK provision (section 5(4) of the Trade Mark Act 1994) provides that a trade mark shall not be registered where… [read post]
16 May 2018, 10:10 am
Casper argued that it didn’t register or use the domain name. [read post]
1 Jul 2022, 2:10 pm
Register now to get in touch with one of our CPAs to assess your situation. [read post]
11 Apr 2012, 9:51 am
To view the webinar invitation and register for the webinar please click here. [read post]
23 Mar 2012, 8:58 am
Kaleidoscope Imaging, Inc. v. [read post]
4 Dec 2020, 7:38 am
The consideration for the contract is Petitioner’s agreement not to use or register the NAKED trademark for condoms in the United States and Respondent’s agreement not to use or register the NUDE trademark for condoms. [read post]
3 Dec 2022, 7:08 am
Pix Credit hereWhile interest in this case, HKSAR v Lai Man Ling [2022] 4 HKC 410, [2022] HKDC 355, reported in September 2022, may be diminishing, its relevance requires sustained examination. [read post]
9 Jan 2019, 7:14 am
Tuesday’s argument in Fourth Estate v. [read post]
28 Jun 2010, 8:13 am
Justice Ginsburg writes for the majority in Christian Legal Society v. [read post]
10 Feb 2014, 1:57 pm
Disney filed a lawsuit in a California Federal Court, Disney Enterprises, Inc. v. [read post]
14 Jan 2019, 1:49 pm
All prescribers will be required to register in the PDMP by January 1, 2018. [read post]
31 Aug 2017, 4:54 pm
A Full Court of the Federal Court has confirmed that patents containing “Swiss-style” claims are outside the scope of the Australian patent term extension regime in its recent judgment of Commissioner of Patents v AbbVie Biotechnology Ltd [2017] FCAFC 129. [read post]
31 Aug 2017, 4:54 pm
A Full Court of the Federal Court has confirmed that patents containing “Swiss-style” claims are outside the scope of the Australian patent term extension regime in its recent judgment of Commissioner of Patents v AbbVie Biotechnology Ltd [2017] FCAFC 129. [read post]
1 May 2009, 4:43 am
See Southern Co. v. [read post]
31 Aug 2017, 4:54 pm
A Full Court of the Federal Court has confirmed that patents containing “Swiss-style” claims are outside the scope of the Australian patent term extension regime in its recent judgment of Commissioner of Patents v AbbVie Biotechnology Ltd [2017] FCAFC 129. [read post]
7 Apr 2016, 2:56 am
When told that the car would be inventoried and towed, Violet stated that he wanted his girlfriend to come and pick it up instead. [read post]
31 Aug 2017, 4:54 pm
A Full Court of the Federal Court has confirmed that patents containing “Swiss-style” claims are outside the scope of the Australian patent term extension regime in its recent judgment of Commissioner of Patents v AbbVie Biotechnology Ltd [2017] FCAFC 129. [read post]
13 Mar 2019, 1:27 pm
PulseOn's design shared the fate of those in PMS v Magmatic, Samsung v Apple and P&G v RB: valid, but not infringed.Is it still worth bothering to register designs? [read post]
2 Jan 2020, 11:35 pm
When one uses a full name as a trade mark, to what extent can one rely on that name to prevent others from registering similar marks? [read post]
28 Oct 2010, 2:35 am
Banker & Company v. [read post]
