Search for: "State v. Still"
Results 4501 - 4520
of 44,284
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
31 Mar 2010, 7:12 pm
Even when federal law is not so clear, an attorney still has a duty to advise the client that deportation "may" result from a guilty plea. [read post]
2 Sep 2011, 6:13 pm
In January, a 5-2 Supreme Court held in People v. [read post]
24 Feb 2012, 1:21 pm
Still, the reliance by PPL and its predecessors in title upon the State's long failure to assert title is some evidence to support the conclusion that the river segments were non-navigable for purposes of the equal-footing doctrine. [read post]
28 Jul 2023, 9:48 am
Lenovo, Optis v. [read post]
24 Mar 2011, 1:15 pm
Still, the change occurred while the case was still in the state court system. [read post]
7 Jun 2011, 7:57 am
Although BIO and the undersigned higher education associations held different views on the Stanford v. [read post]
14 Apr 2015, 4:18 pm
In Del Gatto v. [read post]
4 Jun 2008, 11:26 am
State v. [read post]
31 Jul 2012, 6:36 pm
The decision in Latif v. [read post]
12 Jun 2011, 9:12 pm
Viera v. [read post]
18 Aug 2023, 4:30 am
The § 1983 cases make clear that a defendant state or local official can act in violation of state law while still acting under color of state law. [read post]
13 Aug 2008, 2:55 pm
Carl Folsom won in State v. [read post]
6 Aug 2012, 4:25 pm
Jackson v. [read post]
24 Jan 2025, 6:00 am
Here are the materials in State of Washington v. [read post]
15 Nov 2022, 7:15 pm
In their review of the articles, state parties will have to acknowledge the invocation of Articles V and VI. [read post]
10 Jul 2024, 8:33 am
Over the years, Chevron‘s scope has been shaped through cases like United States v. [read post]
20 Jan 2011, 9:51 am
In State Farm Fire & Casualty Co. v. [read post]
3 Nov 2007, 9:23 am
United States v. de Perez, No. 07-CR-361-1 (JBW), 2007 WL 3010587 (E.D.N.Y. [read post]
25 Jul 2015, 10:19 pm
She corresponded with Keira V. [read post]
9 Feb 2014, 5:49 am
United States Attorney General Eric Holder has announced policy changes in the wake of the landmark Supreme Court case of U.S. v. [read post]
