Search for: "The PEOPLE v. Heard"
Results 4501 - 4520
of 7,749
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Nov 2013, 8:29 am
The stop and frisk case is a big deal in that Judge Scheindlin held that the City had violated the Fourth and Fourteenth Amendments in frisking people without reasonable suspicion of any criminal activity, and that the practices amounted to racial profiling. [read post]
6 Nov 2013, 3:26 pm
So they're entitled to notice and an opportunity to be heard on the motion. [read post]
6 Nov 2013, 7:36 am
Last week, the House Judiciary Committee heard testimony on overcriminalization of regulatory crimes. [read post]
6 Nov 2013, 6:08 am
When they approached the apartment, the officers heard screaming and fighting inside. [read post]
5 Nov 2013, 2:32 pm
When they approached the apartment, the officers heard screaming and fighting inside. [read post]
2 Nov 2013, 9:03 pm
Does it count whether people are asked to join in by some gesture of participation? [read post]
31 Oct 2013, 5:00 am
See Brooks v. [read post]
30 Oct 2013, 5:04 am
For example, I doubt that all of the litigators involved in Apple v. [read post]
29 Oct 2013, 10:06 pm
Experts estimate that more than 100,000 people have died in the last decade from overdoses involving the drugs. [read post]
29 Oct 2013, 7:35 am
I'm holding some papers in the ABC v. [read post]
27 Oct 2013, 2:31 pm
People v Scott, Michigan Dept of State Police v Sitz, Indianapolis v Edmond, People v Jackson and People v Trotter settled that a roadblock or checkpoint stop is a seizure within the meaning of the Fourth Amendment. [read post]
25 Oct 2013, 8:47 am
During her short tenure with the company, the employee heard many derogatory comments by the CEO and the director of people services, including the terms “nigga” and “Brownies” for African-Americans and “Creamies” for Caucasians. [read post]
25 Oct 2013, 12:07 am
Let me weigh that up for a minute….Money v. [read post]
24 Oct 2013, 12:49 pm
“Hmm”, mused Merpel, “the lengths which some people will go to in order to secure the referee of their choice never ceases to amaze. [read post]
22 Oct 2013, 11:28 am
Vallee rendered judgment in Nakhuda v. [read post]
21 Oct 2013, 4:29 pm
We're talking about a company you've never heard of trading OTC on the "pink sheets". [read post]
20 Oct 2013, 8:45 pm
To learn more about the significance of that, and how people traced the IP to John Steele, you can read Joe Mullin or TorrentFreak. [read post]
20 Oct 2013, 6:44 am
However, in the recent case of Yang v. [read post]
20 Oct 2013, 6:44 am
However, in the recent case of Yang v. [read post]
18 Oct 2013, 7:41 am
The facts here may or may not be sufficient to show a defense based on acquiescence (See Christian Broadcasting Network, Inc. v. [read post]
