Search for: "United States of America v "
Results 4501 - 4520
of 8,952
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Apr 2015, 4:59 am
"And is the expression of the cultural diversity that is so cherished by the United Nations and UNESCO. [read post]
26 Apr 2015, 12:22 pm
In a decision that spoke somewhat tentatively about an “evolving understanding of the meaning of equality,” the Court in United States v. [read post]
24 Apr 2015, 4:05 pm
On Appeal to the United States Court of Appeals The court affirmed the district court’s grant of summary judgment. [read post]
23 Apr 2015, 7:08 am
She said, “The trial was called the United States v. [read post]
22 Apr 2015, 4:13 am
United States, in which it is considering the mens rea requirement for federal narcotics cases. [read post]
21 Apr 2015, 12:58 pm
” The Court won’t be settling that issue in the case of Horne v. [read post]
20 Apr 2015, 5:04 am
Steele v. [read post]
20 Apr 2015, 3:51 am
" United States of America, Plaintiff, v. [read post]
18 Apr 2015, 2:43 am
United States v. [read post]
15 Apr 2015, 9:01 pm
After Roe v. [read post]
15 Apr 2015, 6:44 am
In Lexmark v. [read post]
15 Apr 2015, 6:42 am
Clark v. [read post]
15 Apr 2015, 2:23 am
United States of America, Plaintiff, v. [read post]
14 Apr 2015, 12:00 am
The State of America’s Libraries 2015: A Report from the American Library Association. [read post]
13 Apr 2015, 9:04 pm
On June 26, 2013, when the Supreme Court decided the case of United States v. [read post]
13 Apr 2015, 3:33 pm
California Emergency Physicians Medical Group; Med America; Mark Alderdice; Robert Buscho, United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit (No. 12-16514) (April 8, 2015). [read post]
13 Apr 2015, 3:33 pm
California Emergency Physicians Medical Group; Med America; Mark Alderdice; Robert Buscho, United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit (No. 12-16514) (April 8, 2015). [read post]
13 Apr 2015, 7:17 am
United States of America, the court issued a preliminary injunction staying the implementation of the DOL’s recent amendments to its FMLA regulations. [read post]
13 Apr 2015, 6:01 am
The defendants sought to dismiss the Exchange Act claims under an interpretation of the Supreme Court’s Morrison decision that would require, for the U.S. securities laws to apply, that the plaintiff establish that the transaction occurred on a domestic exchange, that title to the security was transferred in the United States, or that irrevocable liability was incurred in the United States. [read post]
10 Apr 2015, 4:00 am
As this exception has only recently been introduced in the United Kingdom - the CopyKat is doubly excited! [read post]
