Search for: "White v. United States" Results 4501 - 4520 of 7,207
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 Sep 2022, 5:01 am by Eugene Volokh
All this suggests that providing pseudonymity to members of particular religious groups might violate the principle of the Texas Monthly v. [read post]
20 Aug 2024, 6:05 am by Brian Finucane
The Resolution provides that the: President is authorized to use the Armed Forces of the United States as he determines to be necessary and appropriate in order to— (1) defend the national security of the United States against the continuing threat posed by Iraq; and (2) enforce all relevant United Nations Security Council resolutions regarding Iraq. [read post]
6 Aug 2020, 3:27 am by Orin S. Kerr
  Judge Reeves assumes that whether an officer's physical intrusion into a car is reasonable is governed by a Fifth Circuit case, United States v. [read post]
28 Apr 2022, 8:30 am by Guest Blogger
This post was prepared for a roundtable on Reforming the Supreme Court of the United States, convened as part of LevinsonFest 2022—a year-long series gathering scholars from diverse disciplines and viewpoints to reflect on Sandy Levinson’s influential work in constitutional law. [read post]
17 Mar 2024, 6:00 am by Mary B. McCord
These efforts increase political polarization, sow discord, generate mistrust in governments and institutions, and undermine the national security of the United States. [read post]
18 Jan 2012, 2:53 pm by Dr. Elliot J. Feldman
” According to the White House, “The two sides [China and the United States] maintain that a vigorous response is necessary and that international cooperation is indispensable in responding to this challenge. [read post]
18 Jan 2012, 2:53 pm by Dr. Elliot J. Feldman
” According to the White House, “The two sides [China and the United States] maintain that a vigorous response is necessary and that international cooperation is indispensable in responding to this challenge. [read post]
4 Oct 2007, 7:18 pm by Steve
The juxtaposition of what the Constitution says about states entering the Union and what it does not say about them leaving, indicates that the door to the Union swings in but not out.Dorf also quotes the 1868 case of Texas v White where the Court said "The Constitution, in all its provisions, looks to an indestructible Union, composed of indestructible States. [read post]
28 Feb 2008, 8:28 am
On the day of my visit, the topic was executive privilege which included discussion of the Presidential Records Act, United States v. [read post]
21 Oct 2011, 9:40 am by admin
District Court for the Southern District of New York to 11 years in prison—the lengthiest term ever imposed on an individual for insider trading violations (United States v. [read post]