Search for: "Antonin Scalia"
Results 4521 - 4540
of 6,601
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Jan 2012, 12:18 pm
Justice Antonin Scalia, writing for the majority, explained that for most of history the Fourth Amendment was understood to have a special concern for government trespass upon the areas that the amendment itself names -- persons, houses, papers and effects. [read post]
23 Jan 2012, 11:47 am
The justices split on the rationale, with a five-justice majority led by Antonin Scalia holding that the attachment of the GPS device to the car was a physical intrusion requiring a warrant under the Fourth Amendment. [read post]
23 Jan 2012, 11:32 am
And: Associate Justice Antonin Scalia said that the government's installation of a GPS device, and its use to monitor the vehicle's movements, constitutes a search, meaning that a warrant is required. [read post]
23 Jan 2012, 11:09 am
In his concurring opinion, Alito poked fun at his colleagues — namely, Justice Antonin Scalia, the self-identified originalist who authored the majority opinion — for applying 18th century legal concepts to modern technology. . . [read post]
23 Jan 2012, 9:31 am
Writing for the majority, Justice Antonin Scalia wrote, ”We hold that the government’s installation of a G.P.S. device on a target’s vehicle, and its use of that device to monitor the vehicle’s movements, constitutes a ‘search,’ ” Opinion [read post]
23 Jan 2012, 9:31 am
Writing for the majority, Justice Antonin Scalia wrote, "We hold that the government’s installation of a G.P.S. device on a target’s vehicle, and its use of that device to monitor the vehicle’s movements, constitutes a ‘search,’ ” Opinion [read post]
23 Jan 2012, 9:04 am
Scalia wrote the main opinion of three in the case. [read post]
23 Jan 2012, 8:58 am
The narrowest view (which Sotomayor said she also supported, at least this time) came in the opinion for the Court by Justice Antonin Scalia, and that is the five-vote result that clearly put police and federal agents on notice that it would be smart to get a warrant before they attach a monitoring device to a vehicle during a criminal investigation. [read post]
23 Jan 2012, 8:55 am
The court split 5-4 over the reasoning behind Monday’s decision, with Justice Antonin Scalia writing for the majority that as conceived in the 18th century, the Fourth Amendment’s protection of “persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures” would extend to private property such as an automobile. [read post]
23 Jan 2012, 8:40 am
Associate Justice Antonin Scalia said that the government's installation of a GPS device, and its use to monitor the vehicle's movements, constitutes a search, meaning that a warrant is required. [read post]
23 Jan 2012, 8:40 am
Associate Justice Antonin Scalia said that the government's installation of a GPS device, and its use to monitor the vehicle's movements, constitutes a search, meaning that a warrant is required. [read post]
23 Jan 2012, 7:17 am
. “We hold that the government’s installation of a GPS device on a target’s vehicle, and its use of that device to monitor the vehicle’s movements, constitutes a ‘search,’” Justice Antonin Scalia wrote for the five-justice majority. [read post]
23 Jan 2012, 7:02 am
Justice Antonin Scalia issued a dissenting opinion, in which Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg joined. [read post]
23 Jan 2012, 5:38 am
WSJ Just look away: Justice Antonin Scalia has a simple solution for people who don’t like all the political advertisements unleashed by the court’s decision in Citizens United v. [read post]
20 Jan 2012, 2:45 pm
Scalia dissented. [read post]
20 Jan 2012, 9:35 am
The FAA and Federal Statutory Claims As a threshold matter, Justice Antonin Scalia, writing for the Court, examined the Federal Arbitration Act (“FAA”) as background for resolution of the case. [read post]
19 Jan 2012, 11:05 am
I have to also point readers to Jeff Gamso's post, "Unfair & Unconscionable: The Capital Jurisprudence of Antonin Scalia," at his Gamso - For the Defense blog. [read post]
18 Jan 2012, 8:58 pm
Scalia dissented. [read post]
18 Jan 2012, 7:26 pm
Kennedy, Antonin Scalia, Sonia Sotomayor, and Clarence Thomas. [read post]
18 Jan 2012, 9:32 am
Justices Antonin Scalia and Clarence Thomas dissented. [read post]
