Search for: "CONVERSE v CONVERSE"
Results 4521 - 4540
of 15,464
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 Jun 2017, 10:08 am
Thus, it is essential when making a generic trade mark claim to clearly identify the goods and services related to the product: in fact, a mark maintains its validity if the public can describe “who” the mark is, conversely, the mark loses its validity if the public only understands “what” the service is Kellog Co. v. [read post]
4 Mar 2021, 10:42 am
In a follow-up to that case, the Third Circuit in Sun Chemical Corporation v. [read post]
4 Mar 2021, 10:42 am
In a follow-up to that case, the Third Circuit in Sun Chemical Corporation v. [read post]
4 Mar 2021, 10:42 am
In a follow-up to that case, the Third Circuit in Sun Chemical Corporation v. [read post]
2 Nov 2015, 9:55 am
Supreme Court’s decision in Clapper v. [read post]
1 Jul 2024, 9:02 pm
Bruen and RahimiTwo years ago, in New York State Pistol and Rifle Association v. [read post]
5 Aug 2010, 10:04 am
[Post by Venkat] Advertise.com, Inc. v. [read post]
2 Jan 2008, 12:03 pm
Briar et al v. [read post]
1 Jun 2015, 4:34 pm
The loss the claimant has suffered is that he has been wronged; conversely the wrong was the unjustified causation of the relevant loss. [read post]
13 Jul 2019, 1:05 pm
Circuit’s decision in Armstrong v. [read post]
3 Nov 2020, 11:39 pm
Later this morning, the Supreme Court will hear argument in the most significant Religion Clause case of the Term, Fulton v. [read post]
6 Nov 2021, 5:29 am
Hofmann v. [read post]
6 Nov 2021, 5:29 am
Hofmann v. [read post]
25 Apr 2011, 1:30 pm
In this Clean Air Act case, Duke Energy Carolinas, LLC (Duke Energy) challenges an attorneys' fees award by attacking the nature of the victory supporting the award, as well as the merits order on which the fee award was based -- summary judgment in favor of environmental group Plaintiffs Southern Alliance for Clean Energy, Environmental Defense Fund, National Parks Conversation Association, Natural Resources Defense Council, and the Sierra Club (Plaintiffs). [read post]
23 Jul 2013, 3:04 pm
JUDKINS, Appellant, v. [read post]
19 Jul 2024, 6:30 am
Conversations with Masood (for whom Forster also had (evidently) unreturned romantic feelings) encouraged him to write an Indian novel. [read post]
27 Oct 2009, 8:35 am
See Mueller v. [read post]
9 Jul 2021, 12:05 am
On the same date of application, the German regional court delivered a judgement in favour of Conversant. [read post]
22 Dec 2021, 2:55 am
As a result, the Nokia v. [read post]
10 Jun 2016, 5:34 am
The conversation began:Rutgerson: Hi babe.Can you tell me more about you? [read post]
