Search for: "Case v. People" Results 4521 - 4540 of 51,389
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 Dec 2019, 2:20 pm
One of the things I try to do when I read cases is to make sense of them. [read post]
3 Jan 2018, 5:10 am by Eugene Volokh
Here's a quick summary of the case, from the intermediate appellate court decision: [E]ach plaintiff alleges that defendants violated her right to privacy under New York Civil Rights Law § 51 by misappropriating her likeness for use in the video game "Grand Theft Auto V. [read post]
3 Jul 2012, 2:11 am by Blog  Editorial
  In relation to control, no material difference as regards the position of the state. 15.07: Thomas de la Mare QC takes the Court through the cases of Barnado and Mallin v Clark. [read post]
14 Oct 2015, 9:06 am by WIMS
<> Supreme Court to Hear Arguments Today for Access to Clean, Low-Cost Energy - The case, FERC v. [read post]
23 Jun 2011, 4:41 pm by Record on Appeal
As a reminder, this case involves the March 14, 2006 breach of the Ka Loko Reservoir that caused the deaths of seven people. [read post]
20 Feb 2008, 1:06 pm
I also liked that he made no reference at all to the high-profile nature of either the case or the participants. [read post]
19 Jul 2013, 10:39 am
In such cases, an attorney may call for a "Stuart instruction," so called because it comes from the 1977 case Stuart v. [read post]
7 Jun 2019, 2:00 pm by Brian Shiffrin
 For cases addressing this specific issue in sex offenses, see People v. [read post]
12 Mar 2011, 12:57 pm by Matthew Nelson
The Michigan Supreme Court denied 3 applications for leave to appeal and ordered oral argument on the application in People v. [read post]
5 Jun 2019, 2:37 pm by Unknown
Supreme Court Bulletin http://www.narf.org/nill/bulletins/sct/2018-2019update.html The following cases recently were denied review: Carter v. [read post]
5 Jun 2019, 2:37 pm by Unknown
Supreme Court Bulletin http://www.narf.org/nill/bulletins/sct/2018-2019update.html The following cases recently were denied review: Carter v. [read post]