Search for: "Cross v. State" Results 4521 - 4540 of 16,701
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 Nov 2018, 1:19 am
Some guidance has however been given in Ryanair Ltd v PR Aviation BV (Case C-30/14) and Verwertungsgesellschaft Wort (VG Wort) v Kyocera and others (case 457/11). [read post]
14 Nov 2018, 4:30 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
However, the instant complaint, while more verbose than the prior complaint, still fails to state a cause of action for “overreaching, undue influence and fraud” (see Weinberg v Sultan, 142 AD3d 767). [read post]
25 Aug 2023, 5:30 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
The defendants moved for summary judgment dismissing the complaint, and the plaintiff and his wife cross-moved for summary judgment. [read post]
21 Jul 2007, 8:28 am
In light of the United States Supreme Court's recent decision in Rita v. [read post]
30 Oct 2012, 8:02 pm by Ben Cheng
House of Representatives in oppositionReply of petitioner Bipartisan Legal Advisory Group of the United States House of Representatives v. [read post]
22 May 2015, 12:26 pm
The court stated: just when a scientific principle or discovery crosses the line between the experimental and demonstrable stages is difficult to define. [read post]
20 Mar 2012, 7:05 am by S
Corby BC v Scott & West Kent Housing Association v Haycraft [2012] EWCA Civ 276 are the first cases that have required the Court of Appeal to consider and apply the guidance given in Powell v Hounslow LBC [2011] UKSC 8 & Pinnock v Manchester CC [2010] UKSC 45 (our notes here & here). [read post]
20 Mar 2012, 7:05 am by S
Corby BC v Scott & West Kent Housing Association v Haycraft [2012] EWCA Civ 276 are the first cases that have required the Court of Appeal to consider and apply the guidance given in Powell v Hounslow LBC [2011] UKSC 8 & Pinnock v Manchester CC [2010] UKSC 45 (our notes here & here). [read post]
29 Apr 2009, 1:04 pm
Supreme Court picked up Burke’s language in a 2001 case called Cook v. [read post]